Virtually every regulation proposed by the Obama administration has been justified by nontransparent data and unverifiable claims, said Smith, who cosponsored the bill. The American people foot the bill for EPAs costly regulations, and they have a right to see the underlying science. Costly environmental regulations should be based on publicly available data so that independent scientists can verify the EPAs claims.
And, right there is the crux of the issue, today. The crap regulations coming out of this criminal enterprise administration are based on whatever crap logic they choose to employ. If the science is sound, there should be NO EXCUSE for not releasing it. That would silence critics across the political spectrum.
My Spidey-Sense tells me there is no such defensible science to be found...
OK, had to check for “semi-satire”, because this is another case of a liberal/leftist actually telling the truth about their goals -
they are going to “go after”, ie, punish with government power,
those who disagree with them. This is what liberals want, deep down in the core of their ideology. It’s THE reason to obtain power.