To: SoConPubbie
The nut doesn't fall far from the tree, but that said, Paul would be better than Warren or Hillary or any other Marxists that would be running.
Cruz/Palin or Cruz/Walker...is my ticket.
6 posted on
04/29/2014 12:30:31 PM PDT by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
To: ExCTCitizen
Paul would be better than Warren or Hillary or any other Marxists that would be running. Isn't it a little early for that desperate, Romney-like plea?
19 posted on
04/29/2014 2:04:11 PM PDT by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: ExCTCitizen
The nut doesn't fall far from the tree, but that said, Paul would be better than Warren or Hillary or any other Marxists that would be running. You miss the point. Rand Paul, like Ron Paul for decades before him, has a purpose and a very lucrative one at that.
Their purpose was and is to draw enough potential Republican votes away to allow the Democrats to win -- over, and over, and over. That's worth a lot of money.
21 posted on
04/29/2014 2:09:37 PM PDT by
meadsjn
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson