“The facts of the case show that everything he did was carefully planned.”
In other words, he knew, before they broke in, that they were going to break in. Is that correct?
Because if that’s correct, he’s guilty. If it isn’t, and they broke in - whatever happens after that point is a tragedy, but within his rights.
If the state will not provide a deterrent to crime, the people must.
Again, heads on pikes, set on fire, big sign out front. Has worked for centuries.
In his mind, he absolutely knew.
Before they even entered his house he is on tape, practicing what he is going to say to his attorney about killing them.
He was certain they were coming, and he planned exactly what he would do when they came, bought new tarps and everything.
If the state will not provide a deterrent to crime, the people must.
After this case it's possible some burglars may think twice, but I would guess most burglars would think "next time I bring a gun."
Also, after this case, most homeowners in the area will probably think: "I'd rather lose insured valuables than spend the rest of my life in prison."
So rape and torture: A-Okay!