Sorry, but I don’t care about basketball. However, they are using a private organization and its bylaws, which have their own set of rules, to cause great property damage to an individual that made these comments to another individual not for publication, permission to record not withstanding.
It is a way to claim that government is not imposing thought crimes, but private entities may do so.
I’ll quit with the basketball, but it is not about basketball.
It’s at least as good as food cures and weather reports.
¾s of the owners can apparently decide your fortune. Sounds like it’s a injurious contract the courts will decide later on.