Please explain what you thought was overt propaganda.
I don’t see it myself. If the things said were true, then there’s only the approved of or not style in question.
The inference I agree with ‘the end justifies the means’ was uncalled for. I do not see any lies in there.
he was not straight up... he inverted it... which made it highly charged--i think to get a certain reaction... unstead of saying that the Dems voted against something, he turned it inside out and said they voted for something... and while i was reading the article, i kept wondering how this is something they could actually even vote on... as it turns out that was not the case... i do not think he needed to do that...
in this case, i do not think "the end justifies the means" was uncalled for... i think if a liberal writer did this with a liberal point of view, many here would not like it... and would think it was typical of their "ends justifies the means" way of doing things...