Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota couple wants $48k in cash seized by Iowa police returned
BringMeTheNews ^ | Apr 26, 2014 | Shaymus McLaughlin

Posted on 05/01/2014 8:50:48 AM PDT by bkopto

Iowa City police seized $48,000 in cash from a Minnesota couple during a traffic stop in March. They want it back – but that’s been proving difficult, the Iowa City Press-Citizen reports.

The publication says Kearnice C. Overton, of St. Paul, was pulled over March 16 for speeding. Overton’s kids were in the car at the time. Police say a K-9 signal gave them the authority to search the car, the Press-Citizen reports. So they did, found the $48,000 in cash, and seized it.

Overton says he got the money from his wife, Tiffani D.S. Barber, to buy some property in Iowa; he drove down there, the deal fell through so he was on his way home. Barber and Overton filed a petition stating the money was wrongly seized – no charges were filed, Overton was not arrested, and he claims it wasn’t illegally earned – and they want it back, the Press-Citizen reports.

But things have become more complicated: The Press-Citizen now reports the cash is part of a federal investigation.

According to the paper, court documents filed Monday show the money is no longer being held by Iowa authorities – but the files offer no details on what the federal investigation is about.

The Press-Citizen notes a hearing regarding the seized cash is still set for May 6.

A similar story of police seizure turned out well for a Moorhead woman.

WCCO reported on a tip received by waitress Stacy Knutson back in 2012 – rolls of cash, left in a box at a table she was serving, totaling $12,000.

The mother of five called police to notify them, the station reported; police said they’d hold it for 90 days in case it was claimed. But when Knutson tried to get it back, she was told it was now being held as drug money.

In April, Knutson’s attorney said Moorhead police had agreed to give back the entire sum, the station reported. Last year, The New Yorker published a lengthy piece about civil forfeiture and its increased use across the country.

Seizing illicitly-gained money can be appealing, the publication noted, because it can oftentimes be used right away by law enforcement to help combat crime.

“In Tulsa, Oklahoma, cops drive a Cadillac Escalade stenciled with the words ‘This Used To Be a Drug Dealer’s Car, Now It’s Ours!”” the piece said. “In Monroe, North Carolina, police recently proposed using forty-four thousand dollars in confiscated drug money to buy a surveillance drone … “

And unlike a criminal forfeiture, which can only happen if a person is convicted, a civil forfeiture can occur even if you haven’t been found guilty.


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Iowa; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; iowa; minnesota
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
One moral of this story: the civil rights of the people are at the mercy of police dogs.
1 posted on 05/01/2014 8:50:48 AM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bkopto

The probably had the family cat with them. So the K-9 got anxious, etc.


2 posted on 05/01/2014 8:56:10 AM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Raises an interesting question, since the police found nothing illegal, what exactly did the dog alert to? To me this means either the dog is fallible or his handler is a lying POS. In either case any evidence in any case found as a result of this duo should be tossed.


3 posted on 05/01/2014 8:57:35 AM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Moral in the case of the waitress. Keep it to yourself unless someone actually come back in the restaurant asking.


4 posted on 05/01/2014 8:57:48 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
The difference between government and a shakedown/protection racket is the fancy uniforms.

/johnny

5 posted on 05/01/2014 9:02:02 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
“In Tulsa, Oklahoma, cops drive a Cadillac Escalade stenciled with the words ‘This Used To Be a Drug Dealer’s Car, Now It’s Ours!”” the piece said. “In Monroe, North Carolina, police recently proposed using forty-four thousand dollars in confiscated drug money to buy a surveillance drone … “

It should read, "The person who used to own this couldn't prove that they deserved it."

6 posted on 05/01/2014 9:02:13 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

“I was walking down fifth avenue today and I found a wallet, and I was gonna keep it, rather than return it, but I thought: well, if I lost a hundred and fifty dollars, how would I feel? And I realized I would want to be taught a lesson.” ~Emo Philips


7 posted on 05/01/2014 9:03:13 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Getting to the point that we have to question do we trust the police anymore.


8 posted on 05/01/2014 9:03:20 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheBorder

I get pulled over about 3 times a year. I’m 60. No k-9 has ever been used on a car I was in, nor was I ever searched.

So, why the dog? And what an amazing coincidence that when they DID use a dog, there was a huge amount of money.

Don’t get me wrong. If there is no crime and no charges, this case reduces the cops to simple theives.


9 posted on 05/01/2014 9:03:26 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

http://www.8newsnow.com/category/28259/8-news-now-video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=10106508


10 posted on 05/01/2014 9:04:08 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (Did you just get off the short bus or what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Getting to the point that we have to question do we trust the police anymore.


That question got answered to my satisfaction decades ago. Literally.


11 posted on 05/01/2014 9:04:29 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Moral in the case of the waitress. Keep it to yourself unless someone actually come back in the restaurant asking.

I once had a 16' flatbed trailer abandoned on my property. I called the police, presuming it had been stolen, emptied, and dumped. After taking the report, the officer asked if I wanted it hauled away. I inquired what would happen if it were, and what would happen if I kept it. He stated the city would sell it if not claimed, or I could keep it, but would have to give it up if claimed. I told him he had my number in the report, if they found the owner, and to told him goodbye.

12 posted on 05/01/2014 9:05:51 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

[ Police say a K-9 signal gave them the authority to search the car, ]

The Rule of DOG over the rule of GOD....

WE HAVE SLIPPED THIS FAR FOLKS!!!!


13 posted on 05/01/2014 9:06:26 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

[ After taking the report, the officer asked if I wanted it hauled away. ]

They probably would have charged you for hauling it away too....


14 posted on 05/01/2014 9:07:24 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Cops are gonna shoot the family dog. Cops are gonna seize the cash in your car. Who don’t know this by now?

Even if this family was not involved in the drug trade, they were stupid to have this amount of cash in their car.

Good luck on getting it back.


15 posted on 05/01/2014 9:09:06 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto; GeronL
Police say a K-9 signal gave them the authority to search the car

Divining rod work if no dog is available?

16 posted on 05/01/2014 9:10:15 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
I've heard of these laws...”civil seizure” (my words).I just might be able to support a variation of such laws...but as they're currently worded/enforced they're BS.If they were set up where a temporary seizure took place and the city/county/state doing the seizure had “X” number of days to file criminal charges that are connected to that money I might support it.Other safeguards would be needed...for example,if charges *are* filed and the verdict is “not guilty” then the government pays the defendant's legal fees...*and* they're open to lawsuits by the defendant.
17 posted on 05/01/2014 9:10:41 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
Civil forfeiture should be illegal. It's unconstitutional.

Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

18 posted on 05/01/2014 9:12:10 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
Civil forfeiture should be illegal. It's unconstitutional.

Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

19 posted on 05/01/2014 9:12:10 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
they were stupid to have this amount of cash in their car.

Really? Why?

It's perfectly legal.

Instead of cowering and letting the bullies get away with it, it's time to stand and make the BS stop.

/johnny

20 posted on 05/01/2014 9:12:43 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson