Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Claire McCaskill believes Secretary of State John Kerry has some explaining to do
Washington Post ^ | May 1, 2014 | Al Kamen and Colby Itkowitz

Posted on 05/01/2014 4:51:45 PM PDT by Second Amendment First

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) is seeking an explanation for the State Department’s recent request for outside tutors to teach a course on how to survive congressional hearings.

In a letter sent to Secretary of State John Kerry this week, McCaskill, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs subcommittee on financial and contracting oversight, questions whether paying contractors to prep officials to face Congress is a good use of the agency’s resources.

“I question the Department’s decision to award a new contract to manage its communications with Congress, rather than focusing its time and attention on fixing its underlying problems,” McCaskill wrote, citing an April inspector general’s finding that the department’s oversight of its contracts leaves much to be desired.

McCaskill noted the Loop’s reporting last month on State’s official solicitation for contractors to run interactive seminars (role-playing!) for officials about to face the dreaded congressional panel. We presume the agency hopes to avoid future embarrassing performances — for instance, an ambassador nominee knowing hardly anything about the country he or she is being sent to (we affectionately like to call it “Bundler-to-Ambassador 101”).

In her note to Kerry, McCaskill wonders whether the department’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs isn’t the place for such training. Among her other questions, the senator asks for a list of “all quotes, bids, proposals and other responses submitted by contractors” for the job and asks which office “proposed this training.”

We’re also curious.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Claire helping to provide cover for her endangered neighboring senators.
1 posted on 05/01/2014 4:51:45 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

When it rains......


2 posted on 05/01/2014 4:55:28 PM PDT by Calusa (Were going to have that person arrested.....that did the video, said Hillary Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

She’s posing as a “concerned” Senator because she knows that she is going to be wiped out in the upcoming election.

If there was ever a Senator in the Congress who fits the description of “pure fraud”, it is Claire McCaskill.


3 posted on 05/01/2014 4:57:23 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I think he has some time to do like life.


4 posted on 05/01/2014 4:58:23 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
In her note to Kerry, McCaskill wonders whether the department’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs isn’t the place for such training.

It's not the misleading of the Senate she objects to. It's just where they get trained for it.

5 posted on 05/01/2014 5:03:00 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Claire McCaskill is especially responsible for Obama being allowed to run for President, even though he was not a U.S. citizen.


6 posted on 05/01/2014 5:22:54 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Imagine having to answer to this boob.

I’m glad it’s Kerry.


7 posted on 05/01/2014 5:30:29 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I’d like to see the boy start with an explanation of those three Purple Hearts he was given.


8 posted on 05/01/2014 6:15:03 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

This is only because she is up for re-election.


9 posted on 05/01/2014 6:56:48 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson