Skip to comments.Using Religion to Fight Inequality, the Left Sinks to a New Low
Posted on 05/05/2014 4:42:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFindEdited on 05/05/2014 7:01:21 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
As a tactic to win the midterm elections first and the White House to follow, prepare for a religious awakening among liberals with more divine inspiration and healing than a Pentecostal revival. Of course this epiphany has nothing to do with faith and redemption; it does, however, have everything to do with a sacrilegious deception for power.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearmarkets.com ...
Where is the ethnic founded by the pilgrims and puritans
that devotion to hard work, duty, thrift, self-discipline
and responsibility wins.
‘Just part of the lefts plan to replace Christianity with the religion of liberalism along with idol worship of the WON. We need to PRAY like never before!
Evil at work.
I detest their stupid “speaking truth to power” shallow mantra that they like to use.
They ARE the power now and dissent is no longer patriotic I guess
Yes they ARE the power in a sick George Orwell type of way.
They seek total control over everyone; and most importantly seek control of how we think.
Just ask them:
“What do you mean by “income inequality”?
“What do you want to be done about it”?
Then ask them how their solution is different from Marxism.
These are people for whom reality itself is plastic and malleable. Before they lie to everyone else, they lie to themselves. This is why BHO can say one thing in the morning and can say the opposite just as forcefully in the afternoon. When they claim something is the “truth”, it is just another lie that is yet to be revealed.
The one constant in their thinking is not truth but advancing the common agenda. This is a type of spiritual force of a religion. And yes, we are seeing spiritual warfare being conducted against humanity right before our very eyes. How else can you explain the common hive-mind, where otherwise seemingly rational people must slavishly repeat silly talking points, or in the case of “gravitas”, must contort an answer or comment in order to work in a common word?
Liberals are begining to speak about the “early church” described in the book of Acts, where the disciples held everything in common, a form of communism, that actually worked for a short while.
Acts 4 Vs 34-35:
34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
35 And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
Problems began to arise very quickly though because of the nature of humans, thus in Acts 5 Vs 1-4 we find:
1 But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession,
2 And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.
3 But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land?
4 Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.
Later Paul talks about church members who would not work, going so far as to say in a letter that those who would not work should not eat.
Communism falls apart when people are involved. Jesus and His 12 Apostles practiced a form of it but remember, there was a thief among the 12 even then, just as today there are thieves who with the help of government steal from others to supply their own needs, without contributing.
This side of Heaven it simply will never work.
I detest their stupid speaking truth to power shallow mantra that they like to use.
...is it even grammatical...?
It is believe it or not.
They think they ARE God.
So of course they believe that God is on their side.
“Some animals are more equal then others”.
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.
The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property either as a child, a wife, or a concubine must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.
It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.
In other words, communism.
The leadership of the called political opposition (Republican) will wonder why as they lose a crucial election because of their inability to stand on principles. Let alone demonstrate they are politically disfunctional unable to congeal into a working political unit.
If if was because they refused to interpret and defend a pronouncement of secession by individual states was driven by dispair, distrust,and disgust with an administration which has adandoned any pretence of following its constitional restrictions. Ruling through lies deception and corruption with what’s best described as a soft tyranny. Because the regime and the controlling political party has discarded even the 10 commandments.
They stupidly allowed its political opposition through its propaganda arm known as the media to decribe the measure as frivolous and racist and participate with the democrats condeming the statement by individual states to seceed by its membership to the point that some in republican “leadership” party repeat the talking point formulation or dismisses it as “insanity” simply demonstrates that as political opposition this groups leadership clearly doesn’t get it.
When the political opposition refuses to even mention their opponents debate about deleting any reference to God at their convention in their platform. When after throwing out any reference to the Creator as an afterthought was shoved back in by the chair which was greeted with boos and jeers two days later certainly hardly indicates any conviction to following God let alone His 10 commandments. Discarding a political opprtunity and a potent political charge.
We do not need government sponsored religious indoctrination and regulation from the “hail Satan” leftists trying to run the show.