Skip to comments.
In Oregon Senate GOP Primary, Beltway Favorite vs 'Homeless to Harvard' Underdog
breitbart.com ^
| 5/5/14
| Michael Patrick Leahy
Posted on 05/06/2014 7:48:18 AM PDT by cotton1706
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: SoConPubbie
I am all for picking the candidate you like the best in the primary.
But after the primary, support the winner, no matter what.
We have to put this Obamacare thing to bed, and for that we need the Senate. Anybody who wants to sit this one out is a fool.
21
posted on
05/06/2014 10:35:31 AM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(Health Care Haiku: If You Have a Right / To the Labor I Provide / I Must Be Your Slave)
To: Haiku Guy
I am all for picking the candidate you like the best in the primary.
But after the primary, support the winner, no matter what.
We have to put this Obamacare thing to bed, and for that we need the Senate. Anybody who wants to sit this one out is a fool.
Same crappy song, different verse that we are hit with it during every election cycle.
If you truly believe that, and if you are a conservative, why all the supporting comments for Wehby right now?
We are in a primary, RIGHT NOW.
As for your comment "Anybody who wants to sit this one out is a fool." I would say that anyone voting for a politician that supports either Gay Marriage or Abortion, whether or not that candidate is DEM or GOP, whether the primary or general election, is the fool.
22
posted on
05/06/2014 10:58:07 AM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: DIRTYSECRET
Wehby is a pro-choice pediatric surgeon. Don’t you see the contradiction?
Of course she opposes Obamacare. Even some Dems do. But she supported Wyden’s plan. Oh, and she supports same-sex marriage.
A win by Wehby is a loss.
If you think that Cruz and Lee can “keep her in line” you are smoking something!
23
posted on
05/06/2014 11:02:07 AM PDT
by
newberger
(Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
To: SoConPubbie
The US Senate deals with federal issues.
Roe vs. Wade
Apparently, the US Supreme Court doesn’t agree with you.
I’m just saying that US Senators aren’t casting many votes on abortion issues, while state office holders are.
I’m not trying to get anyone elected here.
To: SoConPubbie
My supportive comment on Wehby comes from her statement that she will repeal Obamacare. Based on this, I find her acceptable, because this is, far and away, the most important issue to be decided by the Senate.
He opponent is also acceptable, by this same criteria.
Either one works for me after the primary, because they both are on the right side of the Obamacare issue.
25
posted on
05/06/2014 1:03:50 PM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(Health Care Haiku: If You Have a Right / To the Labor I Provide / I Must Be Your Slave)
To: Haiku Guy
My supportive comment on Wehby comes from her statement that she will repeal Obamacare. Based on this, I find her acceptable, because this is, far and away, the most important issue to be decided by the Senate.
Why provide support for someone who is arguably not a republican because she is completely wrong on the social issues in a Primary?
Are you a conservative first or a Republican first?
Are you a conservative or an establishment Republican?
26
posted on
05/06/2014 1:23:22 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Haiku Guy
Either one works for me after the primary, because they both are on the right side of the Obamacare issue.
Do you consider yourself a Christian?
27
posted on
05/06/2014 1:23:56 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Freeping Since 2001
Im just saying that US Senators arent casting many votes on abortion issues, while state office holders are.
They vote on federal judges, don't they?
Furthermore, you cannot trust the word of someone who supports the idea of murdering unborn children or Deviant Marriage to stay true to any principled moral or political position. If they are willing to compromise on the most blatant of moral issues, they'll compromise on everything else at a drop of the hat if they think it is in in their benefit.
These types are not politicians because they want to serve the citizens, they are there for power and prestige only.
28
posted on
05/06/2014 1:34:35 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
They vote on federal judges, don’t they?
That’s the best case for a RINO over a Dem in the Senate. Granted, I’d vastly prefer the more conservative candidate.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson