Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner Posts Easy Victory in Ohio GOP Primary
WSJ ^ | 5-6-2014 | Reid J. Epstein

Posted on 05/06/2014 7:21:11 PM PDT by bimboeruption

House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) coasted to a primary election victory Tuesday over tea party-aligned challenger J.D. Winteregg and two other opponents.

The Associated Press declared Mr. Boehner the primary victor with about 8,600 votes cast — about 6% of precincts reporting.

Mr. Winteregg, a high school teacher who raised less than $50,000, represented Mr. Boehner’s most robust primary challenge in years, prompting the speaker to air television ads for himself. Mr. Winteregg’s campaign was aided by $350,000 in third-party spending, but it was hardly enough to give the speaker a scare.

Democrats Tom Poetter and Matthew Guyette are competing for nomination to face Mr. Boehner in the November general election.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: boehner; congress; ohio; speaker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Colonel_Flagg

But we, in Kansas, don’t deserve the government that the idiots in Cincinnati deserve. But we have to get that same government.


61 posted on 05/07/2014 8:09:43 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

“The entrenched interests are too well dug in and financed.”

This is an important point. It’s pretty simple. The people in power are IN POWER. They have the power to stay in power, the link being in power. Why would we think they’d allow themselves to be removed from power? They’re doing quite well the way things are, why would they change the way things are? For the good of the country?

When Jeb Bush becomes the Republican nominee, will we finally give up on reform through policy?


62 posted on 05/07/2014 8:33:27 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Finny

“Democrats who vote Democrat know exactly what they’re voting for.”

I completely disagree, and would say there are far fewer D’s than R’s who know what they’re voting for. There’s empirical information that backs me up. Maybe I misunderstood you.


63 posted on 05/07/2014 8:36:05 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

And right where they want it to be.


64 posted on 05/07/2014 8:37:28 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
I mean that Democrats know the general philosophy and political approach of the candidate they're voting for: More government. The "liberal" use of government, as in the liberal use of butter in cooking.

Republicans look at a total crap shoot. When I voted for Ronald Reagan, when I voted for Tom McClintock, when I voted for Palin (not McCain, but Palin), the political approach of the guy I was voting for was solid and clear: Less government. Those candidates advocated for the conservative use of government, as in the conservative use of butter in cooking. But on the other hand, when I voted for Schwarzenegger, when I voted for Meg Whitman, when others voted for Romney, when others voted for Boehner and Santorum and any number of Republicans, they were voting for Republicans who have always advocated for the LIBERAL use of government -- more, bigger, government.

It's a crap shoot. We hope for a Republican congress to fight Democrats, but it's a crap shoot whether or not those Republicans will oppose Democrats; on the other hand, when Democrats gain control of Congress, Democrats who voted for them are ASSURED that those Democrats are going to oppose Republicans.

I stand by my words. In their political philosophies, Republicans are a crap shoot; Democrats are a sure thing.

65 posted on 05/07/2014 11:59:28 AM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

After all these years, you still don’t understand how election calls are made? I suggest you read up on how news organizations call elections. It is fairly simple and straightforward. You won’t be so amazed next time.


66 posted on 05/07/2014 11:59:32 AM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Finny

I understand. People who vote for a democrat will not be disappointed. The people who vote for bigger government, will get it. If they vote for the breakdown of moral values, and persecution of Christians (which is the goal of a lot of Rat voters), they’ll have it. If they vote for the empowerment of labor unions, more abortions, more people dependent of government. These are all reasons people vote for Rats, and they’re not disappointed.

I still think, if Rats were honest about what they’re about, they wouldn’t win elections in any state.


67 posted on 05/07/2014 12:24:20 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

In this case, there was minimal information, to the effect that only 6% of the ballots had been counted, but the race had been called. Obviously a lot more ballots have to be counted to call a race. My concern was of political dirty tricks, that one of the campaigns had called the election early to discourage voters for the other campaigns.


68 posted on 05/07/2014 1:11:16 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Spot on with the posts.


69 posted on 05/07/2014 3:39:12 PM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

money is speech. The competition was divided and had no money.

Who can compete with him on the field of the speakership?


70 posted on 05/09/2014 11:34:20 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Great analysis the more I study George W. Bush the more I think why in the world did I vote for the man.


71 posted on 05/15/2014 2:26:10 PM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson