Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy readies X-47B unmanned combat air vehicle for new sea tests
Space Daily ^ | May 2, 2013 at 22:15 | Richard Tomkins

Posted on 05/06/2014 9:44:06 PM PDT by robowombat

Navy readies X-47B unmanned combat air vehicle for new sea tests by Richard Tomkins Patuxent River, Md. May 2, 2013

Northrop Grumman's X-47B unmanned combat air system is to undergo ramped-up testing in preparation for new sea trials, the U.S. Navy reports.

The X-47B is an unmanned aerial vehicle, which will enter service with the Navy in 2020, is the size of a normal combat jet and is designed for launch and recovery from an aircraft carrier.

The U.S. Naval Air Systems Command said the latest series of shore-based tests will be conducted from its Patuxent River facility in Maryland and are aimed at maturing air traffic control and ground support standard operating procedures for "co-use of airspace between unmanned and manned aircraft during day and nighttime operations."

"Continuing to fly the X-47B in the Patuxent River air space will further exercise the research, test, development and evaluation infrastructure with an unmanned air system," said Capt. Beau Duarte, program manager for Unmanned Carrier Aviation at Patuxent River. "These tests are a build-up for the next carrier event this summer."

The X-47B, as in the past, will again embark on USS Theodore Roosevelt sometime in August. The sea-based testing will be to perfect flight deck operations for the aircraft and for integrating the platform with manned aircraft.

"We are working toward a new set of firsts for the X-47B," said Matt Funk, X-47B lead test engineer. "We'll test the new capabilities of the X-47B wing-fold and tailhook retract system, and will demonstrate compatibility with a carrier jet-blast deflector on the flight deck for the first time."

Added Capt. Duarte: "This at-sea period will mark the first time manned aircraft and the X-47B will operate together on the flight deck."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/06/2014 9:44:06 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat

2 posted on 05/06/2014 9:47:17 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Does carrier-UAV software think it’s cooler than other software?


3 posted on 05/06/2014 9:49:04 PM PDT by Dagnabitt (Amnesty is Treason. Its agents are Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt

No telling.
All I know is you will never replace pilots or good systems guys.


4 posted on 05/06/2014 9:53:03 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

5 posted on 05/06/2014 9:55:05 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt
Does carrier-UAV software think it’s cooler than other software?

No, it just thinks it has a bigger CPU.

6 posted on 05/06/2014 10:06:37 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

7 posted on 05/06/2014 10:14:02 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

As a test pilot, I find the X-47B achievements very impressive. I wish them luck and continued success. Carrier deck and flight ops are challenging. That fact is re-discovered by every country that starts or re-starts a carrier program.
TC


8 posted on 05/07/2014 2:49:53 AM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Would make sense to arm the UAV with 4-6 M2 .50 calibers - sending a few to splash a bunch of small armed craft sounds right.


9 posted on 05/07/2014 4:12:47 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

Thanks for the pix. If that was manned that nose wheel would be up to reduce drag.


10 posted on 05/07/2014 7:18:16 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (Serious contribution pause.Please continue onto meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck

The obvious advantages of this platform are abundant. A carrier wouldn’t even need to house the joystick jockeys.

The only downfall would be hacking.


11 posted on 05/07/2014 7:34:54 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

It is just leaving the deck. How fast do you think the gear can retract?


12 posted on 05/07/2014 7:40:22 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet
Nah. that's at the end of the cat as it's leaving the deck.
Wheels up after airborne.Just like this Hornet.

13 posted on 05/07/2014 7:43:16 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: robowombat; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...

Maryland “Drone State” PING!


14 posted on 05/07/2014 2:02:34 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Of COURSE bacon is good for you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson