Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-marriage Republicans win big in Indiana state elections
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | Thu May 08, 2014 09:49 EST | Dustin Siggins

Posted on 05/08/2014 12:27:43 PM PDT by topher

DIANAPOLIS, IN, May 8, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) -- Pro-family and religious groups showed their clout in Indiana politics Tuesday, ousting two Republicans who opposed a marriage amendment earlier this year and successfully defending several vulnerable allies.

Two Republican members of the state House, Kathy Heuer and Rebecca Kubacki, lost their races after opposing a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex “marriage” in the state. In addition to ousting Heuer and Kubacki in favor of Christopher Judy and Curt Nisly, respectively, family groups made sure Rep. Eric Turner won against a challenger despite an ethics controversy.

(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; indiana; promarriage
Interesting article.

Apparently, people in Indiana do not want politicians who support same-sex marriage...

They tossed two out of office...

1 posted on 05/08/2014 12:27:43 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: topher

Such victories are refreshing.


2 posted on 05/08/2014 12:49:00 PM PDT by SgtHooper (This is my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

A nice positive


3 posted on 05/08/2014 1:10:14 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
Apparently, people in Indiana do not want politicians who support same-sex marriage...

Makes no difference what they want. After the federal courts impose gay marriage on Indiana, they'll just put these politicians back in office too. Isn't that how it works now?

4 posted on 05/08/2014 1:28:06 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Well, if the Supreme Court imposes 50 state homosexual marriage at some point, then the issue will be off the table, so to speak. And at that point, all these politicos who support homosexual marriage won’t have to talk about it, because it will be already in place. Just a thought. Once homosexual marriage gets imposed, if it happens, the issue will not be talked about anymore.


5 posted on 05/08/2014 1:58:08 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Well, if the Supreme Court imposes 50 state homosexual marriage at some point, then the issue will be off the table, so to speak.

*******************

It will be “off the table” only if we quit and run. We can try for new justices after the old ones retire, add to their number (allowed under the Constitution), or limit the appellate jurisdiction of the federal courts (also allowed under the Constitution).


6 posted on 05/08/2014 2:32:29 PM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: topher

War on RINO women.


7 posted on 05/08/2014 3:24:13 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

http://time.com/73898/republican-women-midterm-elections/


8 posted on 05/08/2014 3:24:47 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Once homosexual marriage gets imposed, if it happens, the issue will not be talked about anymore.

Just like abortion today?

9 posted on 05/08/2014 3:31:38 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson