Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Monica Lewinsky: Righteous Good Girl (By Modern Standards, She's Actually a Prude)
http://nymag.com/thecut/2014/05/monica-lewinsky-righteous-good-girl.html ^ | 5/8 | MAUREEN O'CONNOR

Posted on 05/08/2014 5:36:32 PM PDT by nickcarraway

“Thanks to the Drudge Report, I was possibly the first person whose global humiliation was driven by the Internet,” Monica Lewinsky writes in Vanity Fair. And though her affair with Bill Clinton may have kicked off our modern era of sex scandal — and set the standard for the boom-bust cycles of denial and apology, sexist fascination, and pseudo-celebrity — a lot has changed since 1998. A presidential candidate made a sex tape. Two U.S. Congressmen resigned over flirtations with women they never even met. Slut-shaming entered the lexicon, but so did cyberbullying, sexting, and reality star. Sixteen years after Interngate, technology has managed a neat trick: It’s now possible to have a sex scandal that’s simultaneously more chaste in its execution and far sleazier in its aftermath. Anthony Weiner never got laid, but the woman who sank his mayoral campaign nevertheless made and marketed a Weiner-themed porno.

By comparison, the woman who had “oral-anal contact” in the Oval Office is the portrait of ladylike restraint. Monica also enjoyed a brief period of celebrity, of course (remember when she hosted a dating show?), but as America became increasingly attention-obsessed and media-optimized, she fell into an adult life “so silent … that the buzz in some circles has been that the Clintons must have paid me off; why else would I have refrained from speaking out?”

Today whore is a pejorative that has more to do with profiteering than promiscuity; the mainstream is learning, slowly, to be sex-positive, but there is no corollary term for empathizing with unabashed attention-seekers. And so Monica’s claim that she “turned down offers that would have earned me more than $10 million” becomes her redemption, a form of abstinence she uses now to prove her virtue. But she decries this double standard, too: “Not lying low exposed me to criticism for trying to ‘capitalize’ on my ‘notoriety.’ Apparently, others talking about me is O.K.; me speaking out for myself is not.”

Capitalizing on notoriety is easier than ever. During Monica’s decade of silence, it actually became a viable career: In the aftermath of Tiger Woods’s sex scandal, porn star Gina Rodriguez founded a PR company dedicated to monetizing what she called “mistresses,” a catch-all term connoting not sexual contact but mere sexual notoriety. For clients ranging from Weiner’s sexters to Woods’s prostitutes to the adultery partners of Mel Gibson and Jesse James, Rodriguez has organized “mistress” nights at strip clubs, “mistress” photo opportunities, and dating-website endorsements. Six months after she went public as the recipient of Carlos Danger’s text messages, Rodriguez client Sydney Leathers invited a photographer to document a series of cosmetic-surgery procedures culminating in labia reduction. She had wanted to sell the cut-off remnants of her labia, too, but U.S. laws about “medical waste” thwarted her.

Suddenly, Monica’s foray into designing tote bags seems quaint.

Some of Monica’s relative classiness may, in fact, be a matter of class. When employment was hard to come by, Lewinsky writes that she fell back on “loans from friends and family.” She was, after all, the kind of twentysomething who worked at the White House, a distinction nobody in Gina Rodriguez’s “mistress” club can boast. (Rodriguez does, however, represent White House party-crasher Michaele Salahi.) But who knows how things might have been different if her scandal had unfolded in the age of the selfie. Today, the feedback loop for sexual schadenfreude has been paired with a relentless egging-on. A decade ago, Monica’s turn at TV stardom had her playing the “stout matron” of a family-friendly dating show; today, notorious women are more likely to play the warbling reality star sobbing through false eyelashes. Would she have filmed ads for Jenny Craig, or something more tawdry?

Lewinsky's essay is in the June issue of Vanity Fair. Even without modern opportunities for post-scandal livelihood, Lewinsky has been branded by the scandal that made her famous. She theorizes that some of her problem arose from the scandal taking place before she’d had a chance to develop her adult identity:

Unlike the other parties involved, I was so young that I had no established identity to which I could return. I didn’t “let this define” me — I simply hadn’t had the life experience to establish my own identity in 1998. If you haven’t figured out who you are, it’s hard not to accept the horrible image of you created by others. (Thus, my compassion for young people who find themselves shamed on the Web.) Despite much self-searching and therapy and exploring of different paths, I remained “stuck” for far too many years.

Now 40, Lewinsky is no longer a naïf playing at stardom. She’s one of the first adults to have gone through the modern gauntlet of mass sexual scrutiny. The impetus for her essay, she says, is a desire to aid the victims of cyberbullying and to help dismantle America’s “culture of humiliation.” I believe she is genuine in that desire (in the depths of her misery, Lewinsky says she contemplated suicide), but I also can’t help but marvel at what may be That Woman’s savviest self-branding decision yet: In the age of Sydney Leathers, she is aligning herself with Tyler Clementi. Monica’s legacy will be about sexual politics, not celebrity.

“So far, That Woman has never been able to escape the shadow of that first depiction,” Lewinsky writes. “I was the Unstable Stalker (a phrase disseminated by the Clinton White House), the Dimwit Floozy, the Poor Innocent who didn’t know any better.” Initial reactions to Lewinsky’s appearance in Vanity Fair played into that trope: Yesterday, Monica’s media nemesis Maureen Dowd (“Moremean Dowdy, as I used to call her”) described the ex-intern as “striking yet another come-hither pose.” If sex is on sale here, I don’t see it. If anything, Mark Seliger’s casually glamorous photos are remarkable for their chastity. When Seliger photographed Rielle Hunter for GQ, the adulteress posed in bed with her pants off. In Vanity Fair, Monica’s virginal white dress looks like something Audrey Hepburn would wear.

“The last time I encountered Monica was at the Bombay Club, a restaurant nestled between my office and the White House,” Dowd reflects. “After requesting that the piano player play ‘Send in the Clowns,’ she leaned in with me, demanding to know why I wrote such “scathing” pieces about her.” Today, Monica might choose a more dignified song. (“Survivor”? “Roar”? Or “Cathy’s Clown” by the Everly Brothers: “When you see me shed a tear and you know that it's sincere / Don’t you think it's kinda sad that you're treating me so bad?”) But she’s leaning in again, and to a tune of her own choosing.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintons; democrat; hillary; slut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: choctaw man
She should be thanking God she became publicly known, otherwise she would have been found in a park somewhere after her suicide.

Sluts are like that, though.

41 posted on 05/08/2014 9:04:30 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Trixie gave the girl good advice on the blue dress.


42 posted on 05/08/2014 9:19:40 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

If she’s a prude I’m a major movie star.


43 posted on 05/08/2014 9:22:49 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I wonder when Hollyweird will make a full length feature movie on Bubba and the Intern. Prolly never....


44 posted on 05/08/2014 9:27:57 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Of course she is an idiot; she’s someone who messed with a married politician and a married man. If not for Tripp, she would likely be dead on Hillary’s orders.


45 posted on 05/08/2014 10:56:40 PM PDT by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

She wasn’t a mistress.
More like a Humidor or Tube Sock for Slick Willie.


46 posted on 05/08/2014 11:13:36 PM PDT by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissingerhaha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

...the woman who had “oral-anal contact” in the Oval Office...
Never heard about that before. So, who was licking whose poop chute?

You misunderstand. That just means she kissed Clinton.


47 posted on 05/08/2014 11:16:53 PM PDT by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissingerhaha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
It's a very minor point, but the Starr report says "In the course of flirting with [Clinton], [Monica] raised her jacket in the back and showed him the straps of her thong underwear,which extended above her pants." The summary you posted leaves out the flirting.

As I remember it, in Lewinsky's August 26, 1998 deposition, she said that, as part of the flirting, Clinton commented on how much he liked her clothing and that he'd like to see what was under it. That's when Monica flashed her thong.

I could be wrong, but note that Starr only summed up the ultimate result of flirting in his report.

Again, it's a tiny difference, but to me she loses 0.39% of her tramp factor if she flashed in response to Clinton's comment as opposed to doing it on her own.

48 posted on 05/09/2014 5:00:21 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

And maybe she was unaware that Bill was married. Or, maybe she is just a tramp. Of course, Bill is the real tramp but we had known that for a long time.


49 posted on 05/09/2014 5:18:42 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

LOL But of course!


50 posted on 05/09/2014 9:47:16 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson