Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party Impact Still Looms Large
Wall Street Journal ^ | Janet Hook

Posted on 05/08/2014 11:20:18 PM PDT by firebrand

"The GOP establishment has embraced the tea party's candidates and policies in order to defeat them." --DSCC

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ideatheft; primaries; republican; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Hostage

Yes.


21 posted on 05/09/2014 9:05:20 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Just getting around to responding to these. When I posted the piece last night, I got a blank page, so I gave up, but now I see it has been partially posted, if just the heading. Must be because of posting rules.


22 posted on 05/09/2014 9:13:05 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

Yes for the inexperienced.

No for the experienced.


23 posted on 05/09/2014 5:53:40 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

It all depends on these folks’ constituents. Things don’t just turn out a certain way inevitably. It depends on us.


24 posted on 05/10/2014 12:14:20 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

Certain political snakes always run to the right to secure their incumbency in the primaries and then run left in the generals. Such pols have increased in numbers and are more prevalent in the last decade.

The conservative movement is pushing back against these unprincipled con artists. There is no question that such pols will govern to the left but will feign a rightest approach when the opportunity arises. In other words they will work to move the leftest agenda forward except when it is safe to vote otherwise. McConnell’s behavior during the push to defund Obamacare is a perfect example.

It does not depend on constituents. That’s where the conflict is. The elected pols do not represent the voters. But when they meet if they meet constituents, they always express how they are working to support the conservative agenda when in fact they don’t. For example, McCain swore in front of his constituents in Arizona in front of the cameras that he would “build that border fence”. And it was a lie.

So many examples can be listed. It’s really a game to these people. What the country thinks is not so relevant to these pols as what they think is good for the people to be governed by. They think the people don’t know what they want or otherwise are not competent to know what they need. They really do look at themselves as a sort of aristocracy, more as privileged denizens of the Beltway class than as representatives of some folks back home.

From the perspectives of unprincipled pols, the constituents are back seat drivers who can be annoying.


25 posted on 05/10/2014 1:12:50 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson