To: Blennos
The last time out he offended enough people that he lost the election. While his 47% statement may be true, statements like that turned off some people who may have been inclined to vote for him.
If he runs this time he will seem more conciliatory to only some issues so as to woo those voters.
He knows the effects of a raise in minimum wage, but getting elected is the goal.
11 posted on
05/09/2014 5:26:07 AM PDT by
ozdragon
To: ozdragon
The fact that he was a liberal pretending to be “severely conservative” probably turned off more voters
29 posted on
05/09/2014 5:51:49 AM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: ozdragon
It’s okay though. People know Romney is an Etch-a-sketch.
48 posted on
05/09/2014 6:24:30 AM PDT by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: ozdragon
If he runs this time he will seem more conciliatory to only some issues so as to woo those voters.
He knows the effects of a raise in minimum wage, but getting elected is the goal. Unfortunately some of the finer points of political strategery escape a lot of people.
63 posted on
05/09/2014 7:01:44 AM PDT by
oldbrowser
(This looks like a make it or break it point for America.)
To: ozdragon
So basically you’re saying it’s ok to lie in order to get elected?
64 posted on
05/09/2014 7:04:22 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: ozdragon
His 47% statement wasn’t true, and didn’t make sense, it was why his campaign could never explain what “47%” he was talking about or what in the world he meant.
69 posted on
05/09/2014 9:21:41 AM PDT by
ansel12
((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson