Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/09/2014 7:20:15 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

2 posted on 05/09/2014 7:26:32 AM PDT by SJackson (the Democrats take back control, we donÂ’t make (this) kind of naked power grab, J Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

If the next President is a Dem (say, Hil), he/she will build on Obama’s legacy and things will get worse. Even if the next president is a strong exec—think Cruz for example—he will look bad for several years as works to repair the damage. It seems almost too much to hope for a Carter-Reagan like turnaround, which was amazingly quick. On the other hand, Carter was less damaging to the US than Obama, and he only had four years to work his black magic.


3 posted on 05/09/2014 7:30:03 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Obama makes sure to take at least two positions on every foreign policy issue. He evolves and then devolves and evolves again.

One of the things Lib/Progs have elevated to an art is to act like it never happened (when their policies turn disastrous).

THE WOMAN WHO WOULD BE PRESIDENT

Hillary Clinton famously decried the infamous kidnapping of 300 Nigerian schoolgirls, but she never mentioned that her State Department (which she ruled w/ an iron hand)---- refused to place the savage "Boko Haram" terrorist group on the State Dept list of foreign terrorist organizations...... way back in 2011, after the group bombed UN headquarters in Abuja.

Hillary's refusal came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen Senators and Congressmen.

“The one thing she could have done, the one tool she had at her disposal, she didn’t use. And nobody can say she wasn’t urged to do it. It’s gross hypocrisy,” said a former senior U.S. official who was involved in the debate.

“The FBI, the CIA, and the Justice Department really wanted Boko Haram designated, they wanted the authorities that would provide to go after them, and they voiced that repeatedly to elected officials.” (Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...

Hillary refused to place the savage "Boko Haram" terrorist group on the State Dept list of foreign terrorist organizations.....and today puts on her best "outrage act" over the kidnapped girls.

Lib/Prog motto---"Faking amnesia means never having to say you're sorry."

4 posted on 05/09/2014 7:31:42 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Obama will eventually adopt the Russian line on Ukraine if for no other reason than to avoid exposing his own impotence.

If he does so, it will.................But then, everybody knows it anyway.................

5 posted on 05/09/2014 7:32:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (Soon there will be another American Civil War. Will make the first one seem like a Tea Party........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Middle East and terrorism,

The Obama administration from top to bottom supports this. Make no mistake about it.

7 posted on 05/09/2014 7:48:43 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Hasn’t this guy figured out that all the things he speaks of are done by design? This isn’t just dumb foreign policy, this is the intentional weakening of our status in the world. Everything this Marxist has done is done to dismantle our country. Be it his financial policies, his foreign policy, his destruction of our military, the destruction of our rights, his green policies and on and on. Not one talking head or MSM writer has the guts to tell the truth, not one. Holder was right, we have become a nation of cowards.


8 posted on 05/09/2014 8:03:49 AM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

The American news people are not just cheerleaders for the Democrats in a cross party contest. They are paid shills for the Democrat Party. They have placed the Democrat Party ahead of The United States of America. As such, they should no longer be called “American journalists”. The proper term for them is “Democrat journalists”.


9 posted on 05/09/2014 8:04:38 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

And three years into his Presidency the entire MSM thought he was a foreign policy genius. Will they ever tire of being wrong ?


10 posted on 05/09/2014 8:13:48 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Obama Foriegn Policy?More like the Original Amateur Hour.This clown makes the Amateur's look good.
12 posted on 05/09/2014 8:16:32 AM PDT by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

The list of impeachable offenses grows each & every day.


13 posted on 05/09/2014 8:18:59 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

If you can’t beat them, join them. And Obama can’t beat them. Joining them is his only option.
Cowards are dangerous and he’s about as dangerous as it gets wonder if voters have came out of the Obama coma yet?.


15 posted on 05/09/2014 8:55:06 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

16 posted on 05/09/2014 9:02:34 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
[Art.] It’s easier for Obama to surrender and pretend that was his policy all along than to put up a fight.

Oh, nonsense. Have you forgotten about how Obama would have "more flexibility" after his (taken-for-granted) re-election?

Well, this is the flexibility.

18 posted on 05/09/2014 4:26:24 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson