Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Slow-Motion Train Wreck of Entitlement Programs
Townhall ^ | 05/09/2014 | Daniel J. Mitchell

Posted on 05/09/2014 8:23:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The Census Bureau just released a report on America’s aging population.

The big takeaway is that our population will be getting much older between now and 2050.

And since I’m a baby boomer, I very much like the fact that we’re expected to live longer.

But as a public finance economist, I’m not nearly as happy.

As I explain in this interview with the Wall Street Journal’s Digital Network (and as confirmed by BIS, OECD, and IMF data), the United States is going to get deluged by a tsunami of entitlement spending.

I mentioned that it’s important to focus on the ratio of workers to retirees. This “dependency ratio” matters because economic output largely is a function of an economy’s working-age population.

To cite my famous cartoons, you need a sufficient number of people pulling the wagon to support those riding in the wagon.

Here’s a chart from the Census report to help you understand the magnitude of the problem. As you can see, both in the United States and other nations, the increase in the dependency ratio is almost entirely the result of aging populations.

Census Dependency Ratio

This is why I said that we face a slow-motion train wreck because of poorly designed entitlement programs.

But the good news is that there is time to reform those programs and avert a crisis.

Which explains why I probably sound like a broken record about the need for genuine entitlement reform.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: entitlement; spending

1 posted on 05/09/2014 8:23:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
They're not counting the population of robots.

Just wait till you see what those numbers do, Mr. Public Finance Economist.

2 posted on 05/09/2014 8:25:29 AM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The problem isn’t old people - it’s gang bangers collecting Social Security Disability starting in their late twenties... or almost the whole city of Detroit...


3 posted on 05/09/2014 8:30:51 AM PDT by GOPJ ( Are we finally going to get a smidgen of truth? - - Freeper Veto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So what is America going to do? They are going to cut Social Security and Medicare and leave Medicaid, food stamps and welfare. And after finding out that cutting Social Security and Medicare is not enough, they will continue to cut Retired Military and Veteran’s. However, Medicaid, Food Stamps and Welfare will continue to flourish. What a country. Sorry but I don’t consider Social Security to be an entitlement. I know some here do but I don’t because we pay into the system (which I know pays the current retirees). Plus you can’t really cut 1400 dollars too much. It already is hardly enough.


4 posted on 05/09/2014 8:30:51 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Governor Scott Walker 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We ought to adopt the Workfare system. In some European countries, if you are on welfare, unemployment comp, food stamps, etc., and can fog a mirror, you show up every day and work an 8 hour day for the State. It might be cleaning toilets, sweeping the street, or even some make-work program, but you do have to show up and work. My guess is that those people might figure, as long as I have to work anyway, I might as well get a better-paying job.

Also, the next time I hear some bozo in Washington tell me that he needs to increase the debt ceiling or he’s going to cut my SS benefits or military spending, I think the absolute FIRST cut is their salaries...zero pay until they balance the budget. After that, all of the able-bodied welfare recipients, and so on down the line, including the taring and feathering of the idiot who thought free cell phones was a good way to spend MY money. If that’s not a program purely to buy votes, what is?

People, we are so screwed...


5 posted on 05/09/2014 8:36:59 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
We ought to adopt the Workfare system.

We can't even adopt drug testing for welfare recipients.

6 posted on 05/09/2014 8:38:35 AM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Maybe not as slow-motion as folks like to think.

Those employers that offer health care are suddenly finding that their insurance costs are escalating sharply, enough so that they may discontinue the practice of providing health insurance altogether, and just pay the fines imposed, as it is much cheaper than continuing the benefit.

The bump-up and fumbling in various venues around the world in matters of diplomacy have us on the verge of choosing between engaging in a fruitless confrontation with a much more disciplined and determined adversary, or to beat a hasty and unseemly retreat in the face of a world full of bullies, more and more of whom have become emboldened.

The capricious and uneven application of law at the national level, and the ever more erratic interpretations of those laws by judges appointed by the Current Occupant, all serve to eat away at the foundations of law and order upon which our republic was based, turning the territory once known as “the United States of America” into a vast vigilante society, respecting only the crushing weight of unwanted attention on the non-compliant or the reluctant.

I miss George Bush. Hell, I miss Bill Clinton, who was at least an American, if a stunted and twisted caricature of patriotism.


7 posted on 05/09/2014 8:42:54 AM PDT by alloysteel (Selective and willful ignorance spells doom, to both victim and perpetrator - mostly the perp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Yeah, I know. I wonder why...?


8 posted on 05/09/2014 8:44:26 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

And they’re going to import millions more of immigrants who will suck up yet more resources either in taking American jobs, or immediately hitching a ride on the great American gravy train, or in some cases, both.


9 posted on 05/09/2014 8:51:27 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Obozo is trying to force businesses to not be allowed to check for a felony in an applicant’s background. Because we need more foxes guarding the hen house, er, more avenues to “redistribute”.


10 posted on 05/09/2014 8:54:05 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We will bring back Prohibition and adopt Daylight Hoarding Time (set clocks forward twelve hours) before Congress ever seriously touches entitlement reform.

We’ll see a VAT on breathing before that happens.


11 posted on 05/09/2014 8:57:56 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“Plus you can’t really cut 1400 dollars too much. It already is hardly enough.”

They are “inflating away” social security. The Consumer Price Index now excludes food & energy because they are considered to be “too volatile”. What a joke. Those two categories alone are eating up most household budgets.

Now the elderly may not drive too much, but they do need to eat. And energy costs are ‘baked’ into the price of everything else we buy.


12 posted on 05/09/2014 9:08:56 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Assuming the country can withstand the immediate costs for entitlements, what happens when the huge demographic bulge of the baby boomers die off?

A huge amount of that entitlement spending will simply disappear because of natural causes.

Granted the debt will remain, but the remaining population will have less to fund on the existing entitlement recipients.

Surely someone has run the numbers?


13 posted on 05/09/2014 9:13:50 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
But the good news is that there is time to reform those programs and avert a crisis.

The global aging crisis.

14 posted on 05/09/2014 9:41:19 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson