Support Free Republic
Freepers, your Contributions make every difference!
Please keep ‘em coming! Thank you all very much!
Posted on 05/10/2014 12:43:55 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama
Republican Sen. Tim Scott doesn’t vote according to the color of his skin, Assistant Democratic Leader Rep. James Clyburn complained in a Thursday Washington Post article.
“If you call progress electing a person with the pigmentation that he has, who votes against the interest and aspirations of 95 percent of the black people in South Carolina, then I guess that’s progress,” he told the Post.
Clyburn’s argument was featured in a generally favorable article about Scott’s practice of briefly working alongside his constituents in South Carolina without revealing his identity.
The comment from Clyburn, age 73, stands in contrast to a comment from James Copeland, who recently worked alongside Scott at a Goodwill store in Greenville, S.C. When Copeland — an African-American — was told of Scott’s identity, he responded positively.
“Oh, wow, I thought he was just some guy off the street,” he said, according to the Post.
“He was really speaking on my level. I felt like I can relate to him. I’d vote for him. Absolutely,” said Copeland.
The Daily Caller asked Clyburn’s press aide, Amanda Loveday, for a comment. She did not respond.
Clyburn is the fourth-ranking Democrat in the House. TheDC asked press aides for House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi if she would demand an apology from Clyburn. The aides did not respond.
The comments about Scott may reflect the Democrats’ desire to stoke racial conflicts in the hope of spiking November turnout among African-Americans. In recent weeks, for example, President Barack Obama has used foreign-policy press conferences to get involved in the disputes over race-related comments by the owner of the LA Clippers’ basketball team, and over the botched execution of an African-American murderer in Oklahoma.
Clyburn’s argument is racialism, rather than discriminatory racism, suggested Roger Clegg, president of the Center for Equal Opportunity.
“He is saying that not only should individual African-American politicians not be allowed to vote their consciences or for what they think is the best policy for all their constituents, he’s also saying that individual voters are shackled to their respective skin colors and can vote only after asking themselves ‘What is best for my group,’” Clegg said.
“It’s tribal. … It’s a step backwards from Martin Luther King’s dream [and from] maybe a couple of millennia” of intellectual advances, Clegg said. Almost 2,000 years ago, Clegg said, the Apostle Paul wrote that “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”
“What one would hope is that the over the past few centuries. … We’ve advanced beyond that,” he said. But unfortunately, “the ugly politics of ethnic identity — even in advanced societies — is always a danger, as we saw with Germany in the last century,” Clegg added.
Clyburn’s comment follows his refusal to condemn racial comments from another Democratic legislator, Rep. Bennie Thompson, who described Justice Clarence Thomas as an “Uncle Tom.”
The judge “doesn’t like being black,” Thompson said during an interview on a Mississippi radio station. The judge is also an “Uncle Tom,” said Thompson, using a derisive term for slaves who whipped other slaves at the behest of white masters.
“The people that I represent, for the most part, have a real issue with those decisions — voter ID, affirmative action, Affordable Care Act — all those issues are very important and for someone in the court who’s African-American and not sensitive to that is a real problem,” Thompson told CNN about Thomas’s legal decisions.
Clyburn downplayed Thompson’s demand for racial solidarity. ”All of us have ways of expressing our disappointments,” Clyburn said on CNN. ”I am very disappointed in Clarence Thomas.”
So why isn’t the GOP-E Congressional leadership jumping up and down over Clyburn’s racist comments and demanding an immediate apology, like Pelosi and Reid would do if the roles were reversed?
Clyburn thinks his black constituents are stupid.
I think he’s making a big mistake.
Ya see Mr. Clyburn, often times one’s own interests are better defined by the content of their character, rather than the color of their skin.
When their character has developed around the values which built this country, faith, liberty, personal integrity, and personal responsibility, then that person is less likely to be motivated by the handouts and bribes offered by the government seeking to enslave them through dependence and extinction of liberty.
Mark
For one thing, it’s because he hasn’t pushed his agenda against conservative black people too far yet.
Exactly right. It’s completely opposite of MLK’s famous “dream” of equality.
The role Samuel L. Jackson played in Django.
Which also describe the likes of Jesse Jackson & Al Sharpton & every other race hustler/black slaver out there.
It certainly wasn't because of the content of his character.
Unfortunately the idiots in MD don't keep voting for him. It's the idiots in South Carolina who do!!!
Oops!
Exactly! Race pimps - all of them!
I will answer for Clyburn, Yep, he would say, our turn to be the masters.
It won’t be long before we will be having fights in the streets between blondes and redheads at the rate the racist dem party is tearing the people of this nation apart.
BHN blather
Bull. "Racialism" is the left's attempt to make their racism somehow different from what they pretend the rest of us practice. In reality, "racialism" is just straight-up racism. When they try this, tell them, "I think you've got a few too many letters there; clearly you meant to say racism." It's all just a part of their standard claim: "It's not racism when we do it!"
So, I guess the bottom line is.
IF I AM RACIST BECAUSE I VOTE WHITE.
IF I AM RACIST BECAUSE I DON’T VOTE BLACK.
So, in the grand scope of things doesn’t that make the
Black that Votes Black only because the candidate is Black and WON’T vote for the White Only because the candidate is White a bigger or at least the same,step of Racist?
Sometimes I just think my head is going to EXPLODE because of all these ‘new’ ground rules ‘WE’ are subjected to on a daily basis.
I guess I will hit ‘OVERLOAD’ my first day of INDOCTRINATION/REEDUCATION CAMP.
Boehner & Mcconnell need to censure him in the House & Senate. Limbaugh was censured tho he told the truth about “phoney soldiers”.
Clyburn comments should not be ignored by the GOP.
Clyburn is still pickin’ cotton for his white masters down at the DNC, I see.
The mere fact that Clyburn has served for as long as he has proves beyond a doubt that his constituents are just that stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.