Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vermont governor signs GMO food labeling into law
CNN.com ^ | May 8, 2014 | Dana Ford and Lorenzo Ferrigno

Posted on 05/11/2014 12:01:22 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201 next last
To: driftdiver
You can know what's in your food (mostly) without government being involved.

And this legislation won't work when everybody labels everything "May contain GMO ingredients". It will be meaningless, like other similar legislation.

/johnny

161 posted on 05/11/2014 6:27:54 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Nonsense, we don’t need that Non-GMO label, we already have one. It’s the label Organic.

Like the Homosexuals, the Food Luddites aren’t content to live and let live. Witness this new law, not all that different than a ‘Homosexual Marriage’ law.

The Food Luddites are insistent on imposing their beliefs on everyone. Just like the homosexuals.

Not to worry, based on recent weather trends, people are going to be clamoring for GMO within the decade.


162 posted on 05/11/2014 6:29:04 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Just keep repeating, Monsato is my friend. Monsato is good. Its good for a multi-national corporation to control our food supply.

Foolish man, you left out the names of the other 30 or 40 companies with successful GMO patents.

163 posted on 05/11/2014 6:30:46 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Welll gollie perhaps they should label things correctly then Johnnie.

They managed to figure out how many calories were in their stuff and whether or not its organic and where its processed.

They can just put their big boy pants on and figure it out.


164 posted on 05/11/2014 6:31:30 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
They won't waste the money. They'll do like they did with peanuts, and say everything may contain it, and then they've complied. And then you still won't know for sure.

It's stupid legislation that won't achieve the desired goal.

/johnny

165 posted on 05/11/2014 6:33:51 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Well perhaps you can just use a wild card and just substitute whichever company your political officer recommends.


166 posted on 05/11/2014 6:34:05 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

>> While I like the labeling, I prefer it as the result of the free market. I’m not a fan of Big Gov forcing this.

I’m not sure how important it is to know whether or not a food product is GMO based. But, plenty of labels claim a non-GMO product which is the free market in action.

Hell, fish isn’t packaged with labels indicating mercury levels, so why should the consumer get all crazy about the potential, unknown consequences of genetically engineered, patented, market-controlled super food?


167 posted on 05/11/2014 6:35:28 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

They will when it effects their sales, or when the law says they have to have more clarity.

Not everything the govt does is bad. Especially when its proven an industry cannot regulate itself.


168 posted on 05/11/2014 6:35:31 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Fish isn’t labeled with a lot of things that aren’t relevant.


169 posted on 05/11/2014 6:36:30 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Giving additional information to people is not a negative. How dumb that you think it is.

How real do you think it is?

170 posted on 05/11/2014 6:36:58 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Melowese Richardson - Democrat Vote Fraud Expert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Government screws up everything it touches. Most laws have unintended consequences. This one does.

It won't affect sales, because almost everything has GMO ingredients at some level. And people aren't going to stop eating over yet another food scare.

And I don't know how you can specify more clarity than is or isn't GMO. That's pretty binary.

/johnny

171 posted on 05/11/2014 6:38:59 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Concern about screwing around with DNA is not a “fetish” or “yet another food scare”. Those people are pushing buttons to see what happens and have no idea if what they are doing will have long term consequences.

Comparing what they are doing today in labs to selective breeding techniques of the past is dishonest. The could easily flip the wrong switch and kill all wheat around the world.

Yes govts screw things up but whats the answer, anarchy? We created a govt to protect us. Companies simply will not do what is ethical and moral in order to manage it themselves.


172 posted on 05/11/2014 6:45:16 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I was simply pointing out your ignorance on this subject.

I was talking over the top of your head, I’ll do better in the future.


173 posted on 05/11/2014 6:46:12 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I’m cynical because I’ve had dozens of CEO’s/CFOs/CIOs tell me they didn’t want to know what was wrong with their IT security. If they knew they’d be forced to fix it.

They’d rather take the risk of losing their customers information then spend the money to fix it. Spending money would effect their bonus ya know.


174 posted on 05/11/2014 6:49:43 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

>> A luddite, it see. Someone afraid of technology they personally do not understand so they shun it.

Proponents of embryonic stem cell research make similar assertions.

I’m more concerned about govt regulating food production and sales. We’ve heard about small markets being raided and shutdown in recent years; seemingly a crime to harvest/produce locally.

What happens when we have practically no choice but to consume Monsanto’s patented byproducts for example?

It’s not an irrational fear to demand information about the origins of the food one is consuming. How the govt gets involved is complicated by its control and regulation of food supplies.


175 posted on 05/11/2014 6:50:06 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

No, I’m quite well read on this subject. Have you ever met an actual genetic scientist?


176 posted on 05/11/2014 6:50:45 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
This law is not going to accomplish anything but make you feel better. It won't work like it's intended. It will simply be another tiny set of words on a label that most people ignore because they know peanut butter contains peanuts.

And it IS another food scare for most people. They tune out the true believers and ignore them because they are strident and won't shut up.

Since you say no one knows what the long term consequences are... who is to say they are all bad? That works both ways.

The DNA tinkering is happening. Has already happened. God alone knows the outcome. I'm not seeing anyone dropping dead yet.

/johnny

177 posted on 05/11/2014 6:51:04 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I don’t read the labels on a damn thing.
Makes no difference to me what the hell they want to put on there.


178 posted on 05/11/2014 6:52:39 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Its a step in the right direction.


179 posted on 05/11/2014 6:52:48 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Are you saying mercury levels in fish are not relevant?


180 posted on 05/11/2014 6:53:04 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson