Osama was also a burden to Al Qaeda; the U.S. could not justify disengaging from the War on Terror until the 9/11 mastermind was dead (or convincingly declared to be). Removing Bin Laden allowed the script to move in the direction of more "moderate" groups, such as the Muslim Brotherhood.
I think this writer has connected more than a few of the dots.
I’ve never read any criticism of obamatollah for ordering full koranimal rights to OBL - the leader of the 9-11 attacks on America.
What leader “honors” such an evil enemy?
Only a “leader” that sees OBL as his spiritual leader. That is treason.
So if you are supporting this article, the US made a deal with Al Qeada, and then decided to kill of its leader, so the US could then make a deal with the Muslim Brotherhood ? One would think that making a deal with a group that just killed off the leader of the last group it had a deal with, could be a little hazardous.