Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justa-hairyape
The big monkey wrench in this theory of course is the killing of Osama Bin Laden. How could they continue to believe they had control of Al Qeada after carrying out that assassination ?

Osama was also a burden to Al Qaeda; the U.S. could not justify disengaging from the War on Terror until the 9/11 mastermind was dead (or convincingly declared to be). Removing Bin Laden allowed the script to move in the direction of more "moderate" groups, such as the Muslim Brotherhood.

I think this writer has connected more than a few of the dots.

71 posted on 05/12/2014 5:02:05 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Charles Martel

I’ve never read any criticism of obamatollah for ordering full koranimal rights to OBL - the leader of the 9-11 attacks on America.

What leader “honors” such an evil enemy?

Only a “leader” that sees OBL as his spiritual leader. That is treason.


72 posted on 05/12/2014 5:10:26 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Martel

So if you are supporting this article, the US made a deal with Al Qeada, and then decided to kill of its leader, so the US could then make a deal with the Muslim Brotherhood ? One would think that making a deal with a group that just killed off the leader of the last group it had a deal with, could be a little hazardous.


101 posted on 05/12/2014 10:18:48 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson