Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rottndog

-——The USD 44 trillion additional investment needed to decarbonise the energy system in line with the 2DS [2C scenario] by 2050 is more than offset by over USD 115 trillion in fuel savings – resulting in net savings of USD 71 trillion,” its says.-——

I don’t believe that nonsense for a second....

How can we save 115 trillion dollars when renewables will cost triple what we pay now....

Also they write “trillions” like it’s a buck 50 in pocket change....


22 posted on 05/12/2014 6:03:50 PM PDT by Popman ("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Popman

Add to that the fact that ‘renewable energy’ still and cannot in the foreseeable future produce grid energy without fossil fuel backup.


23 posted on 05/12/2014 6:09:01 PM PDT by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Popman

Pretty soon, at the rate they’re going, a trillion will be about a buck fifty.


24 posted on 05/12/2014 6:20:19 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson