Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morpheus2009
As far as cousins marrying, so long as you don’t have it as often as the European Royalty did, it isn’t as risky.

Why should there be any consanguinity limitations for a homosexual "marriage"?

When was polygamy legal in the U.S.?

Before 1882.
59 posted on 05/16/2014 11:34:06 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Brown Deer

“As far as cousins marrying, so long as you don’t have it as often as the European Royalty did, it isn’t as risky.

Why should there be any consanguinity limitations for a homosexual “marriage”?”

For that matter why should you even bother calling their union a Marriage? There are no natural children(family) to be bound around nor is their any possibility that there ever will be.

As individuals they may adopt or have children with member of the other sex but in such cases it is rather clear which adult has parental rights & responsibility and there need be no union to bind that which was never naturally formed.

Frankly if they want to dance around and pretend their husband and wife in a sodomite relationship let them do it with their own resources and not involve the rest of us in their sinful affair.


62 posted on 05/16/2014 2:16:20 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson