Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia county takes aim at home Bible studies, freedom of assembly
The Washington Examiner ^ | May 11, 2014 | Matthew Clark

Posted on 05/15/2014 1:16:56 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A new Fairfax County, Va., zoning proposal takes direct aim at the right to assemble in the privacy of one’s own home.

This proposed “Group Assembly in Residential Dwellings” zoning ordinance amendment not only poses a grave and fundamental violation of the U.S. Constitution but smacks of the worst type of government overreach.

The ordinance would limit the number of people one could have in their home to 49 a day, and to exceed that limit more than 3 times in any 40-day period would be a violation of law.

I never imagined hosting a Bible study in my home could one day be a violation of the law, but that’s exactly what this proposal could do.

On a recent Wednesday night, I joined dozens of other concerned residents of the county at one of three planned Fairfax County Board of Supervisors’ community meetings to voice our outrage about this proposal.

I explained how the proposed amendment would violate the right to free speech, the right to religious expression, and the right to freedom of assembly.

The Supreme Court has specifically held that it would be a direct violation of the Constitution for an ordinance “to make criminal the exercise of the right of assembly simply because its exercise may be ‘annoying' to some people.”

That’s precisely what the proposed ordinance aims to do.

It limits the rights of the Fairfax residents to peaceably assemble in their own homes, to hold Bible studies there, and conduct many other lawful activities.

It not only violates the U.S. Constitution, it violates Virginia’s religious freedom statue by substantially burdening an individual’s religious right to hold a Bible study in their own home if it exceeds a certain number of participants.

In fact, the explanation for this proposal on Fairfax County's website specifically denotes “religious meetings” as one of the intended targets of this ordinance.

The supposed need for the proposed amendment is to combat “parking, noise, and other concerns,” yet none of these issues are addressed by the ordinance.

The county has plenty of tools in its arsenal to combat any actual problem without violating the constitutional rights of its citizenry.

As I explained to the county officials, there are numerous ordinances on the books governing parking, noise, trespassing, and property damage.

To limit the number of people allowed to visit a home would be the same as if the county were to address obnoxiously loud music by banning playing the radio altogether in one’s home. It’s that absurd.

It’s been reported that out of the millions of peaceful gatherings that occur in Virginia’s most populous county, there were only six complaints of problematic, large gatherings over the last year.

This ordinance would not only hamper Bible studies, but birthday parties, community block parties, realtors’ open houses, having people over to watch the big game, and so much more.

As one resident complained, being from a large family, just gathering with his extended family for Sunday dinner would suddenly be illegal.

It opens up the county to needless litigation, at taxpayer expense, over a perceived problem that could be solved in less intrusive ways.

This proposed ordinance is just more needless regulation to resolve a nonexistent problem and make violators out of otherwise law-abiding citizens.

Thankfully, at least one member of the board, Pat Herrity, has raised the alarm on this issue, concerned about the legal pitfalls of such an ordinance.

Hopefully, the entire board will heed the opinions expressed by county residents and quash this absurd and blatantly unconstitutional assault on our rights.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; fascism; religion; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: GeneralisimoFranciscoFranco

There was a highly publicized story in Texas, I believe, in which the local town council used this type of law to shut down a church. I forget the exact details, but the owner of the place was put in jail due to these types of laws. I guess the upshot was that the town council passed these laws aimed at specific persons, not because it was a general problem.


21 posted on 05/15/2014 8:24:58 AM PDT by gr8eman (There's no "R" in Warshington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sheana

“We have a big backyard and pool. We used to have huge parties back there, also movie nights with an outdoor theatre screen. We have had over 80 people at a time back there and none of our neighbors cared.”

LOL, same here. My trick was to inform and invite the neighbors. Thereby, the tendency to complain is greatly reduced, especially if they come over, even for an hour or two :)


22 posted on 05/15/2014 1:55:31 PM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

Hah!!! I always invite the neighbors too. None of them have ever come but have never said a word. Our next door neighbor who I am sure gets most of the noise recently came over and begged us not to move. I said....even with our loud parties and such? Lol. He said.....you are the best neighbors, please don’t move. He was relieved when I told him we aren’t going anywhere. We were actually thinking about leaving the state but stuff happens.


23 posted on 05/15/2014 8:49:49 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson