So, essentially NRTL is trying to curry favor with front-runners.
It’s grossly unfair of them to the extent it gives the impression the other candidates are NOT pro-life.
I don’t really follow them anymore, though, after the Romney fiasco. (Cain, too, was suspect to be only quasi-life...didn’t they end up endorsing him as well? I don’t quite remember.)
Well, in Romney’s case, I would assume they were picking the more pro life candidate of the two. In the Tillis case and the Graham case, they did not do that. They picked the less pro life candiate, and yes, it was to curry favor with the GOP estabs.
This proves that the biggest chasm in the GOP is not over social issues…it’s over limited gov principles…..because “big life” and “big gun” will sell out in a skinny minute now. This is what happens when you have HQs in Washington. You become part of it.