This would be a good place to cite a source or two.
Originally, he made comments that what's appropriate in one place may not be in another, so, banning certain types of guns in rural areas may not be right, but it might be right in the inner city.
However, just a couple of weeks ago, he wrote an opinion piece in the Washington Times recognizing the Second Amendment right as fundamental and necessary to liberty, citing the defense of the country through force of privately-owned and maintained arms against an oppressive government as the ultimate defense of the people against tyranny.
I suspect that the Kenyan anti-Christ’s worsening persecution of political opponents is opening his eyes, especially the Bundy ranch thing. I think he's learning.
My own view is that we could do far worse than Ben Carson.
But I am a little prejudiced, as my son was treated at Johns Hopkins by one of his proteges.
sitetest
I usually don’t do other peoples homework for them, however here you go
What don’t you get about SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED good Dr.?
He's talking about a comment Dr. Carson made, something to the effect that he wouldn't want some nut in the hood to have an automatic weapon or similar. Anyway, Dr. Carson later said that he would not trust the government to regulate guns.