Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy

That question has been open for a long, long time.


14 posted on 05/16/2014 8:14:04 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: RinaseaofDs; Impy
Breaking it up into smaller nations is a recipe for chaos. India basically is a continent with myriad nations in a federation.

Take 5 nations for instance: Punjabis, Sindhis, Nagas, Mangalorean Catholics and Keralites

Keralites and Punjabis have their defined "areas", but they are spread throughout India, so a separation of their nations would make those outside the border to be suspect

Sindhis don't have any area of their own, so what about them?

Nagas have a defined historical area, but their nation is too small and economically not able to cope on its own, plus they work outside the borders for remittances

Finally, Mangalorean Catholics are from South Canara which has 3 (or 4) different linguistic and religious groups in near equal proportion. Breaking this up is impossible or at best very bloody

19 posted on 05/18/2014 9:06:58 PM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson