“Cuccinelli never effectively countered the “war on women” ads by the democrats, and that is the primary basis for my statement that he was a deeply flawed candidate.”
Your statement is illogical.
Cuccinelli was a deeply flawed candidate because OTHERS (democrats and RINOs) ran false ads against him having a “war on women”? Some is “flawed” because someone else makes libelous statements about him?
Sorry, but central_va is right - you bought the war on women BS by the barrel. The democrats love “conservatives” like you who so easily fall for their propaganda and distortions.
No doubt you consider Ted Cruz a deeply flawed candidate because democrats and RINOs are saying nasty things about him too.
No; Cuccinelli was a flawed candidate, in large part, because he failed to respond effectively to the false and misleading statements by the Democrats. In fact, for months he didn't respond at all. In politics, you can't let your opponent define you. That's what Cuccinelli allowed the Democrats to do. I seriously doubt that Ted Cruz would allow that to happen to him, but we shall see.