Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Is Time for Ted Cruz to Leave the National Republican Senatorial Committee
RedState ^ | May 18th, 2014 at 06:00 AM | Erick Erickson

Posted on 05/18/2014 9:38:50 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

Ted Cruz is the Vice Chairman for Grassroots Outreach of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (“NRSC”). It is through that appointment that the NRSC hoped to patch up its differences with conservatives.

Instead, it is more and more clear the NRSC is both at war with those groups who support Ted Cruz and at war with those candidates most likely to assist Ted Cruz in the Senate.

From the relationship, the NRSC gets the veneer of working with conservatives and Ted Cruz gets beaten up at every opportunity by the NRSC and its staff and outside consultants.

Here for example, is an NRSC paid consultant subtly attacking Cruz. There have been plenty out in the open in the past. Likewise, the NRSC worked against Ben Sasse in Nebraska, going so far as to invite lobbyists over to their building to fund Shane Osborn’s campaign.

In Mississippi, the NRSC is on a witch hunt to tie Chris McDaniel’s campaign to some nut who overstepped the bounds of propriety. Now that McDaniel is ahead in most polls, the NRSC is attacking him savagely, the groups that support him, and relying on a handful of reporters who write negative stories about Cruz to write negative stories about McDaniel.

The goals Cruz supports are not supported by the NRSC. The candidates most likely to support Cruz are most likely to be opposed by the NRSC. There is no longer a justification for Cruz to be affiliated with the NRSC in a Vice Chairman’s position.

Frankly, if Cruz won’t go to Mississippi and endorse McDaniel, the least he could do for his own freaking side is publicly repudiate the NRSC.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cruz; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: ansel12
We have seen those quotes enough times, couldn’t you just combine your ping list and the flag, into a smaller first postm if you need to personalize every thread?

Ansel, You are the first person to complain about this and I have had many compliments on the quotes.

They are not spam, they are relevant to the discussion at hand.

They'll stay for right now, unless I am asked by the mods to remove them.
21 posted on 05/18/2014 7:49:30 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
It’s because the GOPe are just liberals that don’t like paying taxes.

Bingo!
22 posted on 05/18/2014 7:50:15 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Thanks for the ping!

No Problem. :)
23 posted on 05/18/2014 7:50:51 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
That doesn't mean the McDaniel campaign or McDaniel himself was involved, but that's at least a wee bit suspicious: http://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/politics/2014/05/17/melanie-sojourner-thad-cochran-wife-break-in/9215899 Just dismissing it out of hand like Erickson does in this piece doesn't explain those questions away.

No, I'll tell you what is suspicious. It's you pretending that there is smoke there when there is absolutely no proof that McDaniels or his staff had anything to do with it.
24 posted on 05/18/2014 7:52:58 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

It seems a bit overly intrusive to make it a part of every thread on Cruz, that is an awful lot of screen real estate to have to scroll through hundreds, and eventually, thousands of times, to get to the actual comments.

A banner ad would be less annoying, and more profitable.


25 posted on 05/18/2014 7:54:19 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I would say it seems classy and makes a good point.

I’m all for it.

(just offering another opinion)


26 posted on 05/18/2014 7:57:28 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

That’s not a response to what I said.


27 posted on 05/19/2014 7:42:26 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson