Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: QT3.14

Because he hates the US military.


4 posted on 05/18/2014 10:19:00 AM PDT by null and void (When was the last time you heard anyone say: "It's a free country"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

“he hates the US military”

It’s a mutual feeling. He is no friend to the old guard, even if he has installed some “perfumed warriors.”

My family lost my father this past Christmas day to pulmonary edema, partly due to complications from Agent Orange.
I heard from someone that Obama wanted to send us each a signed certificate of thanks (autopen I’m sure) for my Dad’s service.
My response was that I would do with it what I think he would have done with it: Once I determined who it was from, it would go straight into the `round file.’
So they didn’t send the certificate.
One of his favorite expressions was, `What goes around comes around.’
And it’s coming around. Two more years of this joker.


18 posted on 05/18/2014 11:04:43 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Because he hates the US military.

Not only the military as an institution, but the kind of person who would serve in a disciplined, well-armed and dedicated organization. Armies exist to kill people, break things and make a lot of noise doing it. Just on a visceral level, the very thought of such disorder troubles many people, and their every instinct is of revulsion.

But over the ages, every civilization and even some otherwise rather uncivilized folks have engaged in some kind of warfare with rivals and neighbors, for any number of reasons, and every nation worthy of bearing the designation maintains some level of military preparedness, commensurate with preserving their status with their neighbors.

The United States of America long ago made a covenant with the men who sprang to the nation's defense, that the survivors of the ravages of warfare and their families should not suffer disproportionately for their sacrifices. And it has been (mostly) kept.

There have been lapses before (US Grant, hero of the Civil War, died in an unheated room, penniless), but veterans come to their elected leaders with a very high moral standing, and are rewarded much better than the persons who had never served. Until that got turned on its head with the example of the Korean War and the Viet Nam War periods, in which the veterans were either largely forgotten or openly insulted and despised.

24 posted on 05/18/2014 11:17:15 AM PDT by alloysteel (Selective and willful ignorance spells doom, to both victim and perpetrator - mostly the perp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson