We need more TP in the washroom.
Posted on 05/20/2014 6:53:56 PM PDT by smoothsailing
WASHINGTON – House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., today subpoenaed the Justice Department for documents after Richard Pilger, Director of the Department’s Election Crimes Branch, refused to answer critical questions on the instructions of Justice Department counsel during a transcribed interview on May 6, 2014. The subpoena follows an April 23, 2014 letter from 17 Members of the Committee requesting materials concerning the Department’s involvement in efforts to scrutinize tax-exempt applicants after emails surfaced between Pilger and the Internal Revenue Service’s Lois G. Lerner where they discussed singling out and prosecuting tax-exempt applicants, at the urging of a Democratic Senator. As the Federal Election Commission, the IRS and the Justice Department looked for ways to minimize the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United, a clear outline emerges of government agencies cracking down on constitutionally protected free speech.
In a letter accompanying the subpoena, Chairman Issa stated: “The Department’s refusal to allow Mr. Pilger to testify about matters highly relevant to the Committee’s investigation unnecessarily delays and frustrates the Committee’s Constitutional oversight obligations. The Department’s obstruction in this regard, coupled with its failure to produce any relevant material to date, leads the Committee to conclude the Department is not seriously committed to cooperating with the Committee’s investigation on the Committee’s terms.”
As early as 2010, Lerner described the political pressure on the IRS to “fix the problem” of 501(c)(4) groups engaging in political speech at an event sponsored by Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy. She said:
“And everyone is up in arms because they don’t like it. The Federal Election Commission can’t do anything about it. They want the IRS to fix the problem.”
The Committee issued a subpoena for the production of all documents requested by the Committee on April 23, 2014 which includes:
1. All documents and communications referring or relating to 501 (c)(4) tax-exempt organizations.
2. All documents and communications referring or relating to applications for 501(c)(4) tax-exempt status.
3. All documents and communications between and among Lois G. Lerner and employees of the Department of Justice.
4. All documents and communications referring or relating to the potential prosecution of tax-exempt applicants for statements made on Internal Revenue Service forms.
Today’s letter includes testimony from Pilger and his attorney where he is directed to not answer the Committee’s questions.
Accompanying letter embedded below.
May 20, 2014
The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr.
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530
Dear Attorney General Holder:
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform continues to examine the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative tax-exempt applicants. On April 23, 2014, seventeen Members of the Committee wrote to you requesting material concerning the Department’s apparent role in targeting tax-exempt applicants and its coordination with the IRS on potential prosecutions of tax-exempt applicants. Because you have failed to comply with this request for documents and because the Department has obstructed the Committee’s oversight, the Committee has no choice but to issue a subpoena compelling your cooperation with this important matter.
On April 23, 2014, the Committee wrote to you concerning the apparent coordination between the Department’s Election Crimes Branch and the IRS about prosecuting tax-exempt applicants for making false statements on their application forms.[1] In particular, former IRS official Lois Lerner wrote to her colleagues about a call received from Richard Pilger, the Director of the Department’s Election Crimes Branch. Ms. Lerner wrote:
He wanted to know who at IRS the DOJ folks could talk to about Sen. Whitehouse idea at the [Senate Judiciary Subcommittee] hearing that DOJ could piece together false statement cases about applications who “lied” on their 1024s – saying they weren’t planning on doing political activity, and then turning around and making large visible political expenditures.[2]
The Committee’s letter requested that the Department produce three categories of documents by May 5, 2014.[3] As of today, however, the Department has produced no documents in response to this request.
In addition to the Department’s failure to produce documents, the Department obstructed the Committee’s oversight work during its transcribed interview of Mr. Pilger. During the interview, a Justice Department lawyer directed Mr. Pilger to not answer questions posed by Committee staff an astounding 34 times. Although the Committee’s letter clearly articulated the Committee’s broad concerns,[4] the Department’s lawyer refused to allow Mr. Pilger to answer questions on procedural and substantive matters relevant to the Committee’s oversight.[5] The Department unilaterally, and without the agreement of the Committee, limited the scope of the interview to Mr. Pilger’s interactions with Ms. Lerner.
Among other topics, the Department’s lawyer refused to allow Mr. Pilger to answer questions about conversations within the Department in wake of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,[6] Mr. Pilger’s interactions with the Federal Election Commission about Citizens United,[7] or whether Mr. Pilger had communicated with any IRS official since Lois Lerner’s apology for the targeting on May 10, 2013.[8] These matters are highly relevant to the Committee’s investigation of the IRS targeting, and the Department’s refusal to allow Mr. Pilger to provide this information unduly impedes the Committee’s oversight obligations.
The Department’s lawyer even refused to allow Mr. Pilger to answer basic questions about how he prepared for the interview, which are used to assess the accuracy and integrity of Mr. Pilger’s testimony.[9] The Department’s refusal is highly troublesome in light of an offhand remark from Mr. Pilger later in the interview that, in fact, he had coordinated with Public Integrity Section Chief Jack Smith in preparation for the interview. The following exchange occurred during the interview:
Q My question was about after you met with Ms. Lerner in May of 2013, did you have any discussions [or] communications with Mr. Smith, about not following up with Ms. Lerner because of the publication of the IRS targeting?
A Other than in preparation for this hearing, no. I am sorry, this interview.
Q You had conversations with Mr. Smith in preparation of this interview?
Justice Department Lawyer I am going to instruct you not to answer questions concerning your preparation for the interview.
Committee Counsel He opened the door for this question.
Justice Department Lawyer I am instructing him not to answer.
Mr. Pilger Again, as a Department employee, you have heard counsel for the Department’s directions.[10]
The Department also refused to allow Mr. Pilger to answer questions about highly relevant facets of the Committee’s oversight of the Executive Branch. For example, the Department’s lawyer directed Mr. Pilger to not answer questions about whether the Department is investigating the IRS’s targeting of tax-exempt applications. The Department’s lawyer stated:
Q Sir, do you have any reason to believe the Department’s investigation of IRS targeting is open and ongoing?
Justice Department Lawyer Don’t answer the question.
Q Mr. Pilger?
A I will respect the direction of Agency counsel.
Q Sir, on January 13, 2014, the Wall Street Journal reported that unnamed law enforcement officials said the FBI would not file criminal charges as a result of the Department’s investigation. Sir, do you know how . . . the Journal received that information?
Justice Department Lawyer Don’t answer that question.
Q Mr. Pilger?
A I’ll respect the direction of the Agency’s counsel.
Q Mr. Pilger, did you leak that information to the Wall Street Journal?
Justice Department Lawyer Don’t answer that question.
Q Mr. Pilger?
A I’ll respect the direction of Agency counsel.[11]
The Department’s lawyer also directed Mr. Pilger to not answer questions about whether the Department has investigated the conservative group, True the Vote, in response to requests from Democratic Members of Congress.[12]
The Department’s refusal to allow Mr. Pilger to testify about matters highly relevant to the Committee’s investigation unnecessarily delays and frustrates the Committee’s Constitutional oversight obligations. The Department’s obstruction in this regard, coupled with its failure to produce any relevant material to date, leads the Committee to conclude the Department is not seriously committed to cooperating with the Committee’s investigation on the Committee’s terms. Therefore, the Committee is issuing the attached subpoena for the production of all documents requested by the Committee on April 23, 2014.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Darrell Issa
Chairman
Enclosure
cc: The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings, Ranking Minority Member
[1] Letter from Darrell Issa et al., H. Comm. on Oversight & Gov’t Reform, to Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Dep’t of Justice (Apr. 23, 2014).
[2] E-mail from Lois Lerner, Internal Revenue Serv., to Nikole Flax, Internal Revenue Serv. (May 8, 2013). [IRSR 209282]
[3] Letter from Darrell Issa et al., H. Comm. on Oversight & Gov’t Reform, to Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Dep’t of Justice (Apr. 23, 2014).
[4] See id.
[5] See, e.g., Transcribed interview of Richard Pilger, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, in Wash., D.C., at 31 (May 6, 2014) (“Mr. Pilger is here and available, as a career prosecutor, to talk about his communications, interactions with Ms. Lerner concerning tax-exempt organizations and the surrounding circumstances.”).
[6] Id. at 139-40.
[7] Id. at 140-41.
[8] Id. at 164.
[9] Id. at 33-35.
[10] Id. at 115.
[11] Id. at 162-63.
[12] Id. at 165-68.
We’re gonna need a lot of new prisons just to hold HOLDER’s PEOPLE and Holder himself.
Go, Issa, Go!
So soon?
It’s only been a year.
Just when is Issa going to get a head to mount on his trophy wall?
We need more TP in the washroom.
A newly released email obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Request shows someone instructed Pilger to run the idea of prosecution by Lerner, but it is unclear who the instruction came from.
“When you have a moment, would you call me? I have been asked to run something by you,” a May 8, 2013 email from Pilger to Lerner states.
Shortly after Pilger’s contact, Lerner forwarded the following email to Nicole Flax, the former chief of staff to former IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, who visited the White House 118 times between 2010 and 2011 when the bulk of the IRS targeting of conservatives took place.
“I got a call today from Richard Pilger Director Elections Crimes Branch at DOJ ... He wanted to know who at IRS the DOJ folk s [sic] could talk to about Sen. Whitehouse idea at the hearing that DOJ could piece together false statement cases about applicants who “lied” on their 1024s —saying they weren’t planning on doing political activity, and then turning around and making large visible political expenditures. DOJ is feeling like it needs to respond, but want to talk to the right folks at IRS to see whether there are impediments from our side and what, if any damage this might do to IRS programs. I told him that sounded like we might need several folks from IRS,” Lerner wrote in a May 8, 2013 email.
Flax responded by saying she not only wanted to help, but wanted to rope in the Criminal Division of DOJ.
“I think we should do it – also need to include CI [Criminal Investigation Division], which we can help coordinate. Also, we need to reach out to FEC. Does it make sense to consider including them in this or keep it separate?” Flax responded on May 9, 2013.
Richard Pilger (the one with the gut)
I agree, this is not going away. Gradually Issa is pulling the Justice Department and the White House in to the center of these crimes. There arrogant criminality will ultimately be their undoing. Maybe another special committee is in their future.
Bread and water behind bars would do wonders for his waistline.
Funny how Pilger, Lerner, Holder, and all these government lawyers decide to clam up when they don’t like the questions, when normally they love running their mouths when they’re telling us what to do.
Imagine if we tried that?
Looks like Pilger is candidate for the big house.
People are going to jail. The question is who. And Obama might want to start making early retirement plans because he’s not going to see his full 2nd term through.
The tempo on all these scandals is picking up. It’s getting beyond the ability of Obama media and Obama Inc. to manage.
On what planet would a Justice Department lawyer advise someone not to answer a question about a leak to a newspaper? His own lawyer could and should . But the government lawyer who is supposedly there to investigate and find the facts, that astounds me. I hope people wake up to how much this stinks.
Please bow to your new Overlords.
Best plan is to bow, don't make eye contact and hope they don't notice you.
Stunning is the only word to describe the relentless determination to keep their war going.
Still doing it 2 days before the famous hearing.
That woman has nothing but contempt for the entire system except when it served her criminal purpose.
Nothing but an ordinary psychopath.
i’d start arresting people AND their lawyers.
Peachy, another harshly worded letter. Issa must be really, really, really mad this time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.