Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana judge assailed for light sentence in husband-wife rape case
la times ^ | may 20, 2014 | matt Pearce

Posted on 05/22/2014 4:25:52 PM PDT by lowbridge

Edited on 05/22/2014 4:29:07 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

An Indiana judge came under heavy criticism Tuesday after he ordered no prison time for a man convicted of charges related to repeatedly drugging and sexually assaulting his wife.

On Monday,

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: indiana; rape
The Judge is an elected Judge. (Also a Republican). He has deleted his facebook page for obvious reasons.
1 posted on 05/22/2014 4:25:52 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Nice guy.


2 posted on 05/22/2014 4:31:51 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

It’s the Indiana law that’s the problem


3 posted on 05/22/2014 4:32:45 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Yes it appears to cry out for mandatory sentencing guidelines.
4 posted on 05/22/2014 4:36:23 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge; Kenny Bunk

Give me a break.
Manadory minimum decade in the joint for raping your wife? The way trials are prosecuted and juries swing on “she-said” we’ll have a million Americans with unhappy wives incarcerated in a decade.
“well we were drinking... And he just attacked me...”
Hey baby sue in civil court and you can keep the house!


5 posted on 05/22/2014 4:47:29 PM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

Hmmm...


6 posted on 05/22/2014 5:00:04 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

It’s how the rape law is written. Since she was living in the same abode the law implies sexual consent. If they had been separated at the time he would be sent away.
The law needs to be changed because of the drugging and filming Since she is speaking out it may finally be changed.

Damn case law is the issue. Legislature only can trump it! Hope she is successful and keeps speaking out


7 posted on 05/22/2014 5:02:14 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Well, she did marry the guy and have two children with him.

I would worry if a big sentence was mandated for this that it could be a way for divorcing spouse to get hubby thrown in jail and no child visitation. I've seen plenty of ex's who would do that in a New York minute if they could.

8 posted on 05/22/2014 5:13:13 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
It’s how the rape law is written. Since she was living in the same abode the law implies sexual consent.

That may or may not be the case (most states have gotten rid of that presumption, but I'm not an Indiana lawyer, so I can't say for sure here), but even if it is, they overcame the presumption here. He was convicted of rape, as a Class B felony. This wasn't a case where the judge's hands were tied due to a bad law - the judge very well could have (and should have) sent him away, but chose not to.

9 posted on 05/22/2014 6:22:55 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Ding!


10 posted on 05/23/2014 6:40:05 AM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: golux
Manadory minimum decade in the joint for raping your wife? The way trials are prosecuted and juries swing on “she-said” we’ll have a million Americans with unhappy wives incarcerated in a decade.

Did you read the article? He drugged her, raped her while she was unconscious, and taped it.

11 posted on 05/23/2014 7:07:16 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson