Before reacting to the excerpt, y’all might want to read the whole article.
Her position actually makes a lot of sense.
Do you agree with her closing statement? (I’d post it, but this is the AP)
Read it all an d it liberal screed. You can’t point exactly the position she takes. It is feel good nonsense and contrary to her deflecting strength it’s simple...the strength qualifications for makes are set in stone. If you can’t back it your out. Her closing statement too was nonsensical hog wash. It’s like comparing apples to bananas. Take a position...strength in combat are X qualifications...either the writer clearly takes a position that females can meet the Marine Corps strength qualifications or not.