Probable cause is enshrined in the Constitution. Why would SCOTUS overturn it?
There is a lot left out of this story, but going on what is stated here, the police were not justified in storming her house and incarcerating her.
The word of one “expert” with no other documentation or history of corroborating events, is not sufficient for “probable cause”. That is a major slippery slope, one the fascists will eagerly use against any sort of political dissent.
Probable cause is for serving a warrant, not for storming the Bastille. The police are not even required to knock on the door and announce their presence and intent? BS