Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Driverless Cars Legally Hit Roads as California Issues Licenses; Truckers to be Unemployed
Townhall.com ^ | May 26, 2014 | Mike Shedlock

Posted on 05/26/2014 3:15:22 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
To: Kaslin

When I see them haul a load of logs out of Pecwan I will believe it.


41 posted on 05/26/2014 3:54:29 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Driverless cars, or driverless trucks, on any type of large scale.....are not going to happen.

There a large differences between the world of Google (computers, software, internet) and the world of automobiles.

Cars have had computers for a very long time...and they hardly ever fail. This is because the automotive industry (and the automotive consumer) have a very different expectation of their car’s reliability, vs their web browser’s. My Android phone locks up a few times a month...I take the battery out and restart. If my car did this - time for a new car.

Companies like Google will NEVER meet an automotive consumer’s expectation. Nor will Tesla, which has described their product as more software than car. To an IT guy, they think that’s a good thing to boast about. To most of us, it most certainly is not.

Now on to the concept of the driverless car. It uses LIDAR. I am very familiar with LIDAR, and use it at work...so I am no luddite. I am also aware of how much LIDAR costs...a lot. Google claims $70k...which I think is a lowball estimate. Mobile LIDAR starts at $250k. And then there are laser rangefinders and of course, software. And there’s got to be a large computer on board - LIDAR creates huge files, that bog down conventional computers.

So its expensive. Is it effective? I’d love to see how it reacts to a blowout on the interstate, an engine fire, seized brake, etc. I suspect serious shortcomings.

Trucking industry? It boggles my mind to contemplate how a driverless truck could enter a factory, weigh in, find the right spot to dock, open its own doors or take its own tarp off, weigh out, inspect itself for proper lights and tires, and refuel itself, before getting back on the road.

Or what about a truck with multiple deliveries...who installs load locks...who keeps client #1 from pilfering some of client #2’s delivery?

I’m sure a system that overcomes all of these problems is technically possible...but not reasonably cost effective at all.


42 posted on 05/26/2014 3:55:11 PM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What an opportunity for computer hackers.

Can you imagine someone hacking into the network controlling the car or the wifi used to link it to whatever.

It would be like the Grand Theft Auto video game to them.


43 posted on 05/26/2014 3:58:25 PM PDT by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The roads are already dangerous. People shouldn't expect perfection.

44 posted on 05/26/2014 3:58:42 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Roads Must Roll


45 posted on 05/26/2014 4:00:51 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What could possibly go wrong?


46 posted on 05/26/2014 4:01:26 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I have a 2014 Jeep Cherokee. It can drive on the freeway by itself a ways (lane control, adaptive cruise control). I drove from Truckee (past the inspection station) to Roseville without touching the brake or accelerator. It just occured to me that if it was red in color I could have named it “Redskin”.


47 posted on 05/26/2014 4:02:21 PM PDT by willk (everyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Which of those means of transportation mentioned does NOT have a driver?


48 posted on 05/26/2014 4:04:45 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

They’ll be following at a safe distance and will see the object.


49 posted on 05/26/2014 4:07:09 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just like most large passenger aircraft fly today (for 98 percent of the trip).;


50 posted on 05/26/2014 4:07:26 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Only computers that talk to the outside world can get hacked. Self contained systems are... well self contained.


51 posted on 05/26/2014 4:07:47 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Don’t get angry???

How about Dennis Weaver vs truck in Duel

And Christine?


52 posted on 05/26/2014 4:09:08 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (You can count my felonies by looking at my FR replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“People come up with these grandiose ideas,” says Bob Esler, a commercial trucker for almost 50 years. “How are you going to get the truck into a dock or fuel it?”

Garbage men, circa 1990. "I'll always have a job. Who's going to lift those cans into the truck but us?"


53 posted on 05/26/2014 4:10:01 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

There’s no reason for it to be all or none. Doesn’t matter if the people are slower, collision avoidance is collision avoidance, the methods are the same, and having one side react faster just makes the accident easier to avoid. And frankly the way moving cars respond to input negates most of the computer’s “advantage”.

Machines do grey just fine. People won’t die, they’ll live because the computer driven cars will be better than the human driven cars at not killing people.

Blowouts and breakdowns will be handled the same by a computer as a person, pull over and stop, it ain’t complicated. We already HAVE the tech IN cars right now to do this, the delay right now is our laws and acceptance.


54 posted on 05/26/2014 4:11:22 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob

There was a driver in the truck. And Christine was possessed.


55 posted on 05/26/2014 4:12:27 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Aviation has autopilot.


56 posted on 05/26/2014 4:15:01 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Actually they already ARE happening. Strip mining is now done almost entirely by automated vehicles. And we have cars that park themselves, and cars that avoid collisions for you. The only thing delaying self driving cars in mass production now is us, we still aren’t willing to admit the world we already live in.


57 posted on 05/26/2014 4:15:41 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CapnJack

No network control. That’s how we always thought it was going to be done, but the current drive shows it’s unnecessary. Our cars are already driving themselves.


58 posted on 05/26/2014 4:17:12 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not to worry. I think they hired a lot of the talented programmers who brought us obamacare. What could possibly go wrong?


59 posted on 05/26/2014 4:21:10 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Malaysia Airline MH370

:>)


60 posted on 05/26/2014 4:21:23 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson