Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Costs From Health Law Snarl Union Contract Talks
Wall Street Journal ^ | May 26, 2014 | By Kris Maher

Posted on 05/27/2014 7:04:50 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Disputes between unions and employers over paying for new costs associated with the Affordable Care Act are roiling labor talks nationwide.

Unions and employers are tussling over who will pick up the tab for new mandates, such as coverage for dependent children to age 26, as well as future costs, such as a tax on premium health plans starting in 2018. The question is poised to become a significant point of tension as tens of thousands of labor contracts covering millions of workers expire in the next several years, with ACA-related cost increases ranging from 5% to 12.5% in current talks.

In Philadelphia, disagreement over how much workers should contribute to such health-plan cost increases has stalled talks between the region's transit system and its main union representing 5,000 workers as they try to renegotiate a contract that expired in March.

Roughly 2,000 housekeepers, waiters and others at nine of 10 downtown Las Vegas casinos voted this month to go on strike June 1 if they don't reach agreements on a series of issues, the thorniest of which involve new ACA-related cost increases, according to the union.

Flight attendants at Alaska Airlines voted down a tentative contract agreement with management in February, in part because it didn't provide enough protection against a possible surge in ACA-related costs, union members said. They are still without a new contract.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: failure; obamacare; rinocare; unioncare
Hey unions ... eat your peas!
1 posted on 05/27/2014 7:04:50 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Somebody should have read the ObamaCare bill to find out what was in it BEFORE they passed it.


2 posted on 05/27/2014 7:07:27 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The unions were some of the main players pushing the ACA. Of course they expected to be exempt.


3 posted on 05/27/2014 7:12:22 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Good, I hope it destroys the bastards!


4 posted on 05/27/2014 7:36:46 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The unions are toast. My cousin worked for Kelloggs for decades. She made almost $40 an hour (watching sugar being sprayed on cereal, if the machine broke she call mechanics) and more for overtime and even more for holidays. She seen the cuts coming so she retired. In the last year or so they had hired many people at $12 an hour and some are being laid off now. They are getting rid of the union. No one should make that kind of money. It’s why a box of cereal that cost 50 cent to make cost $5 or 6.00 + Unions are communist in disguise.


5 posted on 05/27/2014 8:25:51 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Time for Republican leadership to either bury the unions once and for all or push going back to how it was in exchange for union money and votes.

Knowing the unions they will double down on stupid.


6 posted on 05/27/2014 8:36:09 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Heck of a reset there, Hillary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Time for Republican leadership to either bury the unions once and for all or push going back to how it was in exchange for union money and votes.

Now there is a double oxymoron - republican leadership doing something.

7 posted on 05/27/2014 8:40:46 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I would expect any week now the head Marxist implementing new rules mandating no interpretation of Obamacare may be used that “hurts” a union’s interests (defined broadly and without specifics). Of course, the IRS will enforce.


8 posted on 05/27/2014 8:43:09 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson