The 10th Amendmendment automatically reserves "government" power to legislatively address marriage issues uniquely to the states, not the federal government.
The states can make laws which discriminate against constitutionally unprotected gay agenda issues, marriage in this example. But such laws cannot also unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights.
The reason that the courts are deciding cases in favor of the gay agenda is the following imo. Pro-gay activist judges have infiltrated the courts and are wrongly legislating gay rights from the bench.
A remedy to this situation is the following. Patriots need to work with both their state and federal lawmakers to make the following laws. Judges need to be required to promptly, clearly and publicly reference all constitutional clauses which Constitution-knowledgeable voters would reasonably accept as justification to case decisions.
And in cases where the Constitution is silent about a particular issue, judges need to be required to likewise state that the issue is a 10th Amendment-protected state power issue.
You may be correct. I keep reading about homosexuals demands for what to teach in schools, & it suddenly occurred to me that kids raised on pro-homosexual teachings are responsible for the percentage of pro-homosexual marriage Americans.
sounds good to me.