Nope, I'm an independent. And, I'm not backing anyone at this point. I'm glad to see the outcome of these primary contests in Texas tonight, but that's the extent of my interest.
That is why you didn’t see post 31 as a legitimate post, somehow you saw it as a personal attack?
I saw it as a posting intended to provoke an argument, and completely tangential to the original poster's point: that good candidates can overcome money from the "establishment".
I just checked, sure enough you are a rino/libertarian yourself, so that explains this mysterious weirdness you have been posting, you want to lash out at the conservatives without revealing that you are angry because of the point made about Paul and libertarianism.
No, I'm not a RINO, or a libertarian, and I don't want to lash out at conservatives. I'm not angry, but just think you -- you personally, not anyone else --- are a bully, compensating for something you feel you aren't getting. I think you need professional help.
Have a nice day.
When I look at your posting history, I see libertarian and Paul arguments and social liberalism defending.
A post that was negative about Paul and libertarianism is what set you off on this thread.
Yet you want to concentrate on a starnge personal attack rather than discuss them and why it would upset freerepublic conservatives to see their names mixed together on a Texas, conservative night.