Barack Obama and His Urban Parasites Declare War on the Constitution

American Thinker ^ | 5/28/2014 | William A. Levinson

[skinkinthegrass]

He was never a professor.hmmm...then he was an consultant on Marxist theory, ...
As it related to the US Constitutional Law?
*snicker!* an useless oxymoron type job title; there as token black,
no quota room @ black studies program? ...and he knew it.

[hal ogen]

“urban parasites”...LIKE

[Liz]

Obama whines to wealthy supporters in gangland Chicago: “Obviously, the nature of the Senate means that California has the same number of Senate seats as Wyoming. That puts us Democrats at a disadvantage,” Mr. Obama said.

THE AUTHOR EXPLAINS: Of course, Wyoming has the same Senate representation as California specifically to prevent individuals like Barack Obama, and his constituency of urban parasites, from imposing their will on the less populous states. This "Great Compromise" of 1787 was a condition of these states' willingness to join the United States in the first place. This is also why each state gets no fewer than three electoral votes, regardless of population. Hillary Clinton dislikes this arrangement, because it gives her constituency less leverage in presidential elections.

===================================================================

REALITY CHECK Obama, the man who campaigned on his alleged Constitutional expertise, still does not "get it".... the constitutional mechanism of the bicameral Congress, and three separate branches of government, is there to impede reckless agendas, such as his. The Founders (who lived under tyranny) constructed our govt to smack down tyranny whenever it raised its ugly head. The Founders' attention to this detail actually works.

We need these protections now, more than ever. To contemplate changes to consolidate the power of an individual or a party, is very, very foolish.

[Jacquerie]

Quite right.

One of the roles of the Senate's "one state, two votes" arrangement is to stop the parasites from voting themselves bread and circuses.

For some reason, two democratically derived houses of congress made sense to most Americans in 1913. It was self-betrayal, and unless it is reversed, it will rightfully be blamed as the cause of our destruction.

[Jacquerie]

Because the constitution specifically, directly acts on the states as states. If the constitution acted only on the people, there wouldn’t have been any need for state representation in the senate.