Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

Just watched the whole thing (almost).

Watch it on PBS you tube today, it’ll be gone soon, just like the boo s at Hillary’s appearance at the Firemens’ gathering on 911 MSG, and any ANY audio of that Kennedy girl - Caroline- our Ambassador to Japan

It is a lecture of how, until Obama came along, all our military was doing was killing people.

Not a hint of recognition to the Constitution,

And ramblings about Global Warming and having to comply with the World’s demands about it in order to gain respect
- to fact finding graduates of one of the World’s finest engineering programs.

There were no shots of the audience to speak of and the few smatterings of applause during the 45 minute scolding were so embarrassing that FOX News cut the sound.

PBS cut the end off pretty quick while the lack of enthusiasm of the applause was embarrassing, don’t know about cause and effect.

The Cadets did stand when Obama talked about a medal recipient a recent graduate’s sister is now a cadet. She got a much more enthusiastic response than ANY thing BO received from this fine group.

Perhaps that’s what they mean.

Otherwise, I suspect they’re overstating it.

But military officers respond to the wishes of the country, and they have to pay Obama respect in public.

It is we who have to elect good leaders for them.

That’s our job.


18 posted on 05/28/2014 2:50:21 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stanne

edit in a laugh track


27 posted on 05/28/2014 2:56:31 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: stanne

‘It is a lecture of how, until Obama came along, all our military was doing was killing people.’

This is why he twice called Marines “corpsemen”. It was intentional. He was dissing them two ways. (1) Insulting them by not pronouncing what they are correctly, & (2) calling them men who make corpses.

Obama has a very deep hateful streak. It comes out very often, & the military is one of his regular targets.

(PS: this was an insult similar to all the middle-fingers he has ‘subtly’ given ppl. If accused, he can deny. It’s part of his immature, passive-aggressive, deep-seated nastiness. Never underestimate how deep the mean streak runs in him.)


34 posted on 05/28/2014 3:04:43 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: stanne; Nachum; All
Confused about Obama’s foreign policy? With Clinton's foreign policy?

You are likely familiar with the “Hierarchy of Needs” - Things a human MUST have in order survive: for a minute, for an hour, for a day, for a week, for a year, etc. Until those needs are met, he or she cannot look for less important things. Air, water, food, clothing, shelter, etc .. All can get ranked according to a human’s most important priorities.

Now consider every foreign policy decision, speech, foreign leader, foreign trip (well - except vacations), and foreign award or recognition Obama has chosen since 2008.

In every case, when given a public choice, Obama has chosen American over Israeli;

American (if democrat-donor or government-enhanced) over republican/capitalist/energy/white/male/oil/red state;

European-republics over America;

European-socialist governments over European-republics;

3rd world socialist-republics over European-socialist governments;

socialist-selected governments over socialist-elected governments;

socialist-dictatorships over socialist-selected governments;

communist governments over socialist dictatorships;

Islamic republics over communist governments;

Islamic secular states over Islamic republics;

Islamic dictatorships over Islamic secular states;

Islamic-tolerant states over Islamic dictatorships;

Islamic religious states over Islamic-tolerant states;

Islamic Sharia states over Islamic religious states;

Islamic fundamentalist states over Islamic Sharia-compliant states;

Radical Islamic bands over Islamic fundamentalist states. Confused about Obama’s foreign policy? With Clinton's foreign policy?

You are likely familiar with the “Hierarchy of Needs” - Things a human MUST have in order survive: for a minute, for an hour, for a day, for a week, for a year, etc. Until those needs are met, he or she cannot look for less important things. Air, water, food, clothing, shelter, etc .. All can get ranked according to a human’s most important priorities.

Now consider every foreign policy decision, speech, foreign leader, foreign trip (well - except vacations), and foreign award or recognition Obama has chosen since 2008.

In every case, when given a public choice, Obama has chosen American over Israeli;

American (if democrat-donor or government-enhanced) over republican/capitalist/energy/white/male/oil/red state;

European-republics over America;

European-socialist governments over European-republics;

3rd world socialist-republics over European-socialist governments;

socialist-selected governments over socialist-elected governments;

socialist-dictatorships over socialist-selected governments;

communist governments over socialist dictatorships;

Islamic republics over communist governments;

Islamic secular states over Islamic republics;

Islamic dictatorships over Islamic secular states;

Islamic-tolerant states over Islamic dictatorships;

Islamic religious states over Islamic-tolerant states;

Islamic Sharia states over Islamic religious states;

Islamic fundamentalist states over Islamic Sharia-compliant states;

Radical Islamic bands over Islamic fundamentalist states.

51 posted on 05/28/2014 3:32:26 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: stanne
But military officers respond to the wishes of the country, and they have to pay Obama respect in public.

It is we who have to elect good leaders for them.

That’s our job.

You nailed it. It seems not many here understand that and wish that we'd institute a coup or some such nonsense b/c they don't like the POTUS or Congress.

Ain't gonna happen. Elect better leaders.

57 posted on 05/28/2014 3:45:07 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: stanne
It is a lecture of how, until Obama came along, all our military was doing was killing people.

Not a hint of recognition to the Constitution, And ramblings about Global Warming and having to comply with the World’s demands about it in order to gain respect - to fact finding graduates of one of the World’s finest engineering programs.

There were no shots of the audience to speak of and the few smatterings of applause during the 45 minute scolding were so embarrassing that FOX News cut the sound.

PBS cut the end off pretty quick while the lack of enthusiasm of the applause was embarrassing, don’t know about cause and effect.

I have the feeling your report will be by far the most insightful... you'll trump the New York Times and all their sycophants...easily.

58 posted on 05/28/2014 3:45:34 PM PDT by GOPJ (>The Mainstream Ministry of Information does not stand for liberty. Freeper Gene Eric)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: stanne

Please, can you provide a link?

I went to the PBS video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DIr2KieO3I) and they already scrubbed the introduction and the video begins with the big zero expressing thanks—post ‘applause’—for his introduction.


59 posted on 05/28/2014 3:45:43 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: stanne
There were no shots of the audience to speak of and the few smatterings of applause during the 45 minute scolding were so embarrassing that FOX News cut the sound.

I saw the first ten minutes or so on CNN. They did not mute the applause, it just sounded like it.

They also only showed the audience once, about half of them clapping listlessly while the president led applause with his bizarre rhythmic clapping--about something, I forget what. It was an embarrassing moment. And the cadets clearly couldn't have cared less about keeping time with the contemptible poser.

76 posted on 05/28/2014 4:23:43 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: stanne
Seems to me the 75% who didn't respond means a large percentage of our Military Cadets are better informed than those who still blindly support Obama.

You are correct his speech was an embarrassment...that is not how you speak to our Military Cadets.... But then Obama has no regard nor respect for our Military as we have witnessed many times.


107 posted on 05/28/2014 7:04:04 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson