Swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, not a man.
That is in great part of what makes the US military great.
Those 25% probably swore an oath under their breath to support and defend the big zero and not the Constitution.
Was that man not elected under the mechanisms dictated by the Constitution? Isn’t the legislature and judiciary totally on board with the executive branch, all as outlined in the Constitution? Has he given the military orders that are blatantly illegal?
We swore to uphold and defend the Constitution so how does a serving member react “respectfully” to someone who is ACTIVELY shredding, ignoring and usurping said document...?
And this is NOT hyperbole...he has actually, in public, denied the legitimacy of the tenets of the Constitution. This is treasonous....
So does the military turn a blind eye to this?