To: GeronL
Although I agree on the premise that the senate would be more conservative without Senator Marbles, HOWEVER, it is the number of senators that count. He will vote whatever the leadership says to vote. If the left maintains a 51 to 49 control of the senate we are all screwed. Any and all legislation brought forward by dumbo will be passed. WE CAN AFFORD THAT AS A NATION. IMO, the best case would be to have Marbles voted in but not give a leadership role.
14 posted on
05/29/2014 5:58:02 AM PDT by
Cyclone59
(Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
To: Cyclone59
He will vote what the leadership says? He is the leadership and he is not on the same side as me for sure
15 posted on
05/29/2014 6:00:22 AM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Cyclone59
He is the republican leader in the Senate. That is not going to change as long as he is in the Senate.
Unfortunately, Cornyn is #2. I won't be voting for Cornyn in his general election.
/johnny
To: Cyclone59; cotton1706; All
true..depends on the Senate Ldr, If it's "Cornhole", what difference would it make?
if it's SML CRUZ, and SotH Louie Golmert (hopefully) it's "lights-on" for "Bathhouse"
Barrack 0'Muslim et al. ("Rustler" Reid in prison/Nazi Nancy, too much Botox)
54 posted on
05/29/2014 6:47:17 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson