Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japanese oil tanker explodes in Hiroshima, captain still missing
Japan Daily Press ^ | May 29, 2014 | Ida Torres

Posted on 05/29/2014 7:32:51 AM PDT by thackney

A Japanese oil tanker located in the Himeji Port in western Hiroshima exploded on Thursday morning, causing the ship to catch fire. Seven of the ship’s eight crew members were rescued, with four suffering from severe burns, but the captain is still unaccounted for as of this writing.

The 998-tonne Shoko Maru had just finished unloading its crude oil cargo and was near the Hyogo Prefecture coast when the explosion occurred at around 9:30 AM. Fortunately, the tanker was almost empty, or else the damage would have been worse. According to Akihiro Komura, an official from Syoho Shipping who owns the ship, one of the crew members was removing paint by using a grinder which might have triggered the blast. He also confirmed that all eight on board were Japanese nationals and that the 7 were confirmed alive. All of them were brought to the hospital, with four being treated for serious injuries. They still have no word on the whereabouts of the 64-year-old captain, but will continue search and rescue operations.

When news broke about the explosion, Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was in parliament and interrupted an ongoing debate to break the news. Footage showed ships and aircraft fighting the fire that engulfed the ship with water cannons. Authorities assured the public that there was no danger to the other ships in the area since the tanker was stationed just outside the port area.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; tanker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last


1 posted on 05/29/2014 7:32:51 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

I didn’t know they made 998 ton crude carriers.


2 posted on 05/29/2014 7:34:39 AM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Small tanker, probably with empty tanks and the fumes ignited.


3 posted on 05/29/2014 7:34:48 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Why there hasn’t been an explosion in Hiroshima like that since 1945.

Too soon?


4 posted on 05/29/2014 7:35:54 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I was ready for it. *smirk*


5 posted on 05/29/2014 7:39:15 AM PDT by blu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Lol

Maybe


6 posted on 05/29/2014 7:39:51 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That’s some hole in that boat...


7 posted on 05/29/2014 7:39:56 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Built in 1994

http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/details/ships/9088017/vessel:SHOKO_MARU


8 posted on 05/29/2014 7:42:33 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

An empty oil tank is much more dangerous than a full one. When you weld, cut, or grind on an empty vessel which had flamables inside, you first fill it with water to displace the potential fumes. If you can’t fill it with water, you fill it with an inert gas which prevents oxygen fom being available. Any fire needs three things. Heat, fuel source, and oxygen. Remove any one of those three and there is no fire risk.


9 posted on 05/29/2014 7:44:08 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks!


10 posted on 05/29/2014 7:44:41 AM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Even the terrorists Oil is dangerous. Don’t they purge the tanks and fill with nitrogen?


11 posted on 05/29/2014 7:45:44 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

It is tiny, as tanker ships go.

This may have been used for Lightering, unloading larger ship that cannot come into the port due to size.


12 posted on 05/29/2014 7:47:04 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Yes. Forgot to flood the tanks with Nitrogen to reduce explosion risk


13 posted on 05/29/2014 7:48:26 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

I do not believe they do. The insides of the tanks are always considered a hazardous area. There would normally be no sparking equipment inside.

When maintenance has to be done, they need to be purged.

I know in Valdez, Alaska, the fumes coming off the ship being filled are directly captured and used for power generation. However in recent years, the slow rate of tankers required adding additional generation on diesel.


14 posted on 05/29/2014 7:49:43 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Explosion in Hiroshima ?


15 posted on 05/29/2014 7:56:21 AM PDT by llevrok (Straight. Since 1950.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
This explains why natural gas line leaks are EXTREMELY dangerous--there is enough oxygen in the air that one spark could causse a huge explosion, as the recent destruction of a building in New York City so clearly showed.
16 posted on 05/29/2014 7:59:08 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If it had been full, it wouldn’t have exploded. Empty ship is a fuel air explosive device.


17 posted on 05/29/2014 8:10:34 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

WHAT HAPPEN?


18 posted on 05/29/2014 8:15:51 AM PDT by RichInOC (HA HA HA HA....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

19 posted on 05/29/2014 8:25:45 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

TANKER EXPLODED.


20 posted on 05/29/2014 8:29:43 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson