Is that so? Well maybe your scatological pal's writing is even less coherent than I gave him credit for. All he needed to do is clarify who he meant by
"ALL "Flat Earthers" need the final "solution"; idiocy need not be tolerated. '
when I asked him but it appears that he prefers drama to answering a simple question.
It appears you came looking for an argument where none needed to exist.
It you traced back the conversation were were having you would have seen what we were talking about, which was a hypothetical situation where if Cantor wins the primary that some morons might support his liberal democrat opponent, just like some people are hoping Alison Grimes wins in Kentucky.
Those are “the Flat Earthers”, people who hope the marxist democrat wins if the “tea party” candidate loses the primary plus GOpster was including in that category a fellow who likes to waste time trying to get certain “moderate” democrats, with no money or real hope to win, get elected in safe rat areas where Republicans can’t win (the democrats he choose he had even less chance to win than a Republican). Basically he’s the using the term for everyone out of touch with reality.
While you are correct this is a public forum and you have every right to jump in, it’s not hard to trace back a conversation to see what it’s actually about, rather than jumping in with a hostile accusation. If you don’t know how to trace back a conversion, I can show you.
Anyway, everybody should chillax up in here.