Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The History Behind Benjamin Netanyahu and Pope Francis’s Awkward Jesus Moment
Daily Beast ^ | 06/01/2014 | Jay Parini

Posted on 06/01/2014 6:27:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Tzfat
Bottom line: the idea that “Jesus” spoke Aramaic and “not Hebrew” is founded upon simply anti-Judaism.

What utter nonsense! Jesus is just as much Jewish no matter what he and his fellow Jews spoke at the time. Not everything is an anti-Jewish conspiracy.

61 posted on 06/02/2014 7:13:45 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

You protest too much. If it does not matter, then why keep pressing the point? Because it is Catholic doctrine, that is why. It is Catholic doctrine for a reason. The “supremacy of the Church” over the vanquished Jew. Take a look at your
Vatican art, some time.


62 posted on 06/02/2014 7:40:04 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat
Because it is Catholic doctrine, that is why.

It's not doctrine, just the scholarly consensus. Theologically it would make no difference what language Jesus and his fellow Jews spoke. But I do wonder why you must insist that his language must have been Hebrew. Would he be less Jewish if he spoke Aramaic? There were plenty of Jews at the time, as there are now, who did not speak Hebrew as their vernacular. They were no less Jews than those who did.

63 posted on 06/02/2014 7:51:42 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
Actually, until I started studying ancient manuscripts I was of the opinion that he spoke Aramaic. I was surprised to learn that it is theology (or politics) that informs that position, not history.

There is a profound amount of anachronism at work as well. Because the Babylonian Talmud tells us that common Jews had forgotten Hebrew, many assumed that was true across the Jewish communities. It was not. In Alexandria, Jews spoke primarily Greek. In Rome, they spoke primarily Latin. In Babylon they spoke Aramaic. In Partha, they spoke Persian etc. But from the days of Ezra to the Second Jewish Revolt, the common tongue in Israel was Hebrew.

A simple visit to the Israel Museum and Bible Lands Museum in Jerusalem will confirm what Hebrew scholars have said since at least the time of the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls - as a member of the working class, Jesus would have spoken the language of the working class: Hebrew.

You mentioned the Targumin as if their being in Aramaic indicates anything at all - and yet you ignore that fact that the Dead Sea Scrolls predate the Targumin - and the vast majority are in Hebrew.
64 posted on 06/02/2014 8:02:58 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Yes, this is just goofy.


65 posted on 06/03/2014 3:25:23 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
According to my Bible, everyone was speaking to each other in English.

Yeah! Finally, someone makes sense here.

Also Jesus spoke in red words.

:^)

66 posted on 06/03/2014 5:36:52 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson