Posted on 06/03/2014 1:13:21 PM PDT by justlurking
Yesterday, I asked readers how they felt about setting up independent commissions to handle redistricting in each state. Commenter Mitch Beales wrote: "It seems to me that an 'independent panel' is about as likely as politicians redistricting themselves out of office. This is the twenty-first century. How hard can it be to create an algorithm to draw legislative districts after each census?" Reader "BobMunck" agreed: "Why do people need to be involved in mapping the districts?"
They're right. These programs and algorithms already exist. Brian Olson is a software engineer in Massachusetts who wrote a program to draw "optimally compact" equal-population congressional districts in each state, based on 2010 census data. Olson's algorithm draws districts that respect the boundaries of census blocks, which are the smallest geographic units used by the Census Bureau. This ensures that the district boundaries reflect actual neighborhoods and don't, say, cut an arbitrary line through somebody's house.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
And they get paid the mean average income in the country or state.)
one rep per 750,000 citizens. the 30,000 may have been original but it isn’t that now.
How does that redistricted Texas map vote compared to how the current district map votes?
Number of GOP congressmen - up or down?
I really don't care. If we agreed on an algorithm, and the application of said system to validated census data would always generate the same map, I don't care who 'wins'.
yeah gerrymandering is like the rent controlled buildings of politics. Shady, slimy and should be illegal!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.