Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Kicks Obama to Curb over Taliban Deal
Breitbart ^ | 3 Jun 2014 | by DAN RIEHL

Posted on 06/04/2014 6:12:20 AM PDT by Resettozero

Clearly distancing herself from Barack Obama as regards exchanging Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five high-level Taliban terrorists, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is making it known she "was personally and intensely involved in the debate over swapping five Taliban commanders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in 2011 and 2012. But she had severe reservations about the potential deal, and was demanding stricter conditions for the release of the prisoners than what President Obama settled for last week".

It's also now being reported that "Clinton had a framework deal drawn up that was much tougher on the Taliban than what ultimately got done two years later". Given what seems to be an increasingly negative view of the deal that was done and the very real possibility of a run for the presidency in 2016 by Hillary, it's likely Team Hillary has decided to make sure her fingerprints are nowhere near the exchange.

Three former administration officials who were involved in the process told The Daily Beast that Clinton was worried about the ability to enforce the deal and disinclined to trust the Taliban or the Haqqani network in Pakistan, which held Bergdahl until this weekend. Clinton was so concerned, the former officials added, that she may not have even signed off if the negotiations had succeeded.

“She was heavily involved from the beginning, she was very skeptical of the arrangement, she was very wary of it,” one former administration official said. “If we had come to some agreement she perhaps would have backed it, but we never got to that point.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bergdahl; clinton; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Paine in the Neck

See my comment #39


41 posted on 06/04/2014 7:18:02 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
She's lying. She (hillary) released some statement earlier in the week that said she approved of this mess.

I remember that too. I guess she thought it would make her look like an insider who deserves to be president. hillary has proved again she has NO INSTINCTS on foreign affairs.

What I'm wondering about is her being part of any discussions. She doesn't have any official position in gov, appointed or elected. How can she be part of those internal discussions when people who were supposed to be in the loop weren't?

Isn't that shadow government illegal? Was hillary given information she no longer has clearance for? hmmm..........

42 posted on 06/04/2014 7:23:10 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Ye Ole political finger in the air position.

Hillary tests which way the wind is blowing on this.


43 posted on 06/04/2014 7:31:09 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o-n-money

I do not think she would have done the deal—she would have listened to the critics. She is a great deal smarter than Obummer.


44 posted on 06/04/2014 7:55:45 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
If it works, then I was instrumental in its formation. If it fails, I had nothing to do with it and even strongly opposed it. If I'm cornered, I might say yes, I might say no, and I might say maybe. If you insist on answers and point out inconsistencies then you are nothing but a partisan hack, and you are attacking me purely for political gain.
45 posted on 06/04/2014 8:04:48 AM PDT by JPG (Yes We Can morphs into Make It Hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPG

You get a rope and I’ll find a horse.


46 posted on 06/04/2014 8:10:41 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

This very well could have been their convoluted and evil thought process. I can believe it.

So, the soldiers (or were they Seals) who were not supposed to fight, not supposed to resist in Benghazi, instead DID fulfill their oaths to defend America, and caused the plan to be changed on the fly. Am I closer?


47 posted on 06/04/2014 8:17:07 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

HRC: “I may hate America and want to see it destroyed as much as Obama does, but I’m not stupid enough to be this blatant about it!”


48 posted on 06/04/2014 8:18:49 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

On RKO radio this morning, Jeff Kuhner reported that Barry has been obsessed with the release of these 5 terrorists since taking office.


49 posted on 06/04/2014 8:21:05 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

Hmm I wonder. Obammy made a deal with the devil Stevens for The Obammy 5. Stevens is killed what to do.

Very possible. No telling what else is at the bottom of this RAT hole.


50 posted on 06/04/2014 8:29:28 AM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Yep.

There wasn’t supposed to be a firefight at Benghazi we already know that.

If there had been a one on one exchange Stevens for the bling turd in the turban, there would have been too many questions, too obvious that it was an orchestrated attack with Egyptian govt.

Throw these 5 terrorist in for the hostage/prisoner exchange and the Egyptian govt is off the hook.


51 posted on 06/04/2014 9:20:04 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Tougher deal? Oh right, Hillary! The terrorists get 2-years of in-country arrest at a luxury hotel in Doha instead of 1-year?


52 posted on 06/04/2014 9:22:39 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bailee

It wouldn’t be Obama making the deal it would be Hillary’s deal, Obama just agreed with it.


53 posted on 06/04/2014 9:24:27 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
Now that the proverbial s*** has hit the fan, she’s covering her immense fanny.

No, no, NO!

Hillary, realizing that the Republicans are not going to put up any serious resistance to her coronation, needs a punching bag to show she's tough - AND she needs to not be overidentified with the administration.

SO... She is going to run against Obama.

Watch Chris Matthews, Lanny Davis, and the white WaPo opinion staff - mark my words, Team Clinton is rolling, and if Obama winds up under the bus? Ces't la guerre.

54 posted on 06/04/2014 9:27:14 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Comrades in a sheit fight what a rush.


55 posted on 06/04/2014 9:30:16 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

You do know that she issued a statement on Monday or so (I haven’t tried to find it again) in which she backed this? She’s now running in the opposite direction.


56 posted on 06/04/2014 9:33:13 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Team Clinton is rolling, and if Obama winds up under the bus? Ces't la guerre.

Am going to watch for some form of this scenario to play out this weekend on the talking-toilet TV circuit. I'm coming to this kind of thinking too.
57 posted on 06/04/2014 9:34:08 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Funny how Rats make a statement then have to come back later and make another statement on what they really meant and then have to come back even later and make another statement and then etc, etc.
58 posted on 06/04/2014 9:50:33 AM PDT by The Cajun (tea party!!!, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
Funny how Rats make a statement then have to come back later and make another statement on what they really meant and then have to come back even later and make another statement and then etc, etc.

Takes a willing and complicit press/media.
59 posted on 06/04/2014 9:53:34 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
"She released some statement earlier in the week that said she approved of this mess."

Yeah but earlier earlier in the week was so long ago..."at this point what difference does it make"

60 posted on 06/04/2014 9:55:55 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson