The dems praising Peanuts Carter right before Benghazi is a “FACT” about Benghazi which can’t be ignored.
Obama hasn’t talked to Peanuts once since his election in 2008 because early on repubs compared him to Peanuts Carter and with Obama we were getting Peanuts second term.
For 4 years Obama didn’t want to be associated with Peanuts in any shape form or fashion, so why praise Peanuts at the dem convention so he would be compared to Peanuts?
Here’s what I believed happened.
Hillary and Obama planned the attack in Benghazi and Stevens’ was supposed to be taken hostage.
Hillary could do what she does best and play ignorant claiming the attack was “spontaneous” because of a video.
Nobody above the level of idiot would believe the “spontaneous” lie so naturally Stevens being taken hostage would be compared to Peanuts and the Iranian hostage crisis.
Obama wasn’t supposed to win the election so his loss could be blamed on “racist republican dirty tricks” and “republicans collaborating with the terrorist to make Obama look like Peanuts Carter”.
Obama being lame duck releases terrorist to get Stevens back, but he isn’t released until Romney takes office giving Hillary an “October Surprise II” to use against Romney for 4 years until her run for president in 2016.
Republicans end up getting blamed for collaborating with terrorist.
The weapons Hillary and Obama were giving to the terrorist can be blamed on republicans since the terrorist “took” the weapons in the attack planned by republicans.
5 or more terrorist being released on the world would also be blamed on republicans.
After 4 years of nonstop terrorist attacks all because Romney and the republicans collaborated with terrorist to make Obama look like Peanuts Carter, Hillary would be a walk-in for president in 2016.