Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

The label Liberal Democrat doesn’t mean what it does in the United States. They are sort of like the Reform Party, ideologically between the Labor Party and the Tory Party.


15 posted on 06/06/2014 3:07:19 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; UKrepublican; AuH2ORepublican; GeronL; moose07

The Lib Dems are merger of the old Liberal party (which was once good, I don’t know who I would have preferred in the 19th Century) which definitely wasn’t as bad as Labour, and the Social Democrats, a less marxist breakaway faction of Labour (I guess they were Blair New Labour Types, before Blair Labour was very far left back then).

On balance I’d say they are better than Labour, I’m sure there are some issues where they are worse (level of EU support for one).

A Tory/Ukip coalition would be the ideal result. I don’t know if that result is possible, I fear a lot of narrow plurality wins for Labour and not many UKIP seats. I am now wishing that instant-runoff voting had passed.

Lib dems may get wiped out, the old Liberals came back from oblivion once or twice but I’m not sure they would. Cameron would likely court their rump to merge with his Tories. UKIP could be the new third party with increasing Tory defections.


17 posted on 06/06/2014 7:38:35 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson