ICR article image
Discussion of health, education, welfare, drugs, abortion, environment, housing, unions, employment, social security, religion, arts, humanity, sports, and other cultural and societal issues.
ICR article image
our Universe could be a molecule in something REALLY BIGS Ham sandwich
Pinging as a FYI..!
How do we know there weren’t TWO or more Big Bangs? Successive conglomerations of matter after the original could cause multiple ‘bangs’ across billions of years, thus causing interference with the matter from the original explosion......................
I had my doubts before article came out. The problem with the Big Bang theory is that it does not mention who lit the fuse that set off the bang.
Personally, I don’t think God just lit a galactic firecracker and then relied on the resulting explosion to put it all together. I like to think he spent seven days painting it all into place.
If the universe is no longer constantly expanding, then how do I explain my waistline?
I enjoy all your creation articles, fishtank.
The Big Bang immediately followed the Big Dinner and a couple of drinks.
cranksville
There’s going to be more data in the next few months that should settle the issue about whether the polarization is from dust or gravity waves. I like how science self corrects and admits its mistakes the majority of the time.
The ICR on the other hand is a disgrace to religion and human knowledge.
"Because inflation is a component of the Big Bang model, which so clearly contradicts the biblical account of creation contained in inerrant Scripture, Christians should have known that this alleged “proof” would eventually be shown to be false."
~~~~~~~~~~~
The professional, pecuniary YEC truth-twisters are already hard at work -- trying to refute the BICEP-2 results.
If they would search for truth, instead of playing "Yabbut..." with every reported scientific discovery, perhaps their witness for Christ would be worth less than zero.
Oh, well, that's what you can expect when mere men try to make themselves and their primitive, ego-driven misinterpretations of Genesis superior to the Almighty, Omnipotent Creator of all that is.
Scripture IS "inerrant". Mere men who twist both Scripture and scientific data to pad their own pockets and demean God into a pitiful dwarf -- shrunken to fit their mini-minded, self-centered worldviews -- are most certainly not inerrant!
P.S. Anyone want to dump $114.97 (a 15% discount!) on DVDs hyping their medieval diminution of God?
Pecuniary? What profit motive...?
P.P.S. No reputable scientist is "alleging" that the BICEP-2 data (just published in March 2014) is "proof" of anything. "Proof" is the refuge of dogmatists who are trying to bolster their own lies.