[Oliviaforever]

Yes. but it does not change the fact that the federal judge in Wisconsin completely a fabricated construct which is entirely false in order to force a ruling on Wisconsin Christians.

[Enterprise]

"As an initial matter, defendants and amici have overstated their argument. Throughout history, the most 'traditional' form of marriage has not been between one man and one woman, but between one man and multiple women, which presumably is not a tradition that defendants and amici would like to continue," Crabb wrote in her opinion."

What makes this so outrageous is that she cites "throughout history." True, other societies, traditionally, have practiced multiple females married to one male. Others, traditionally, have practiced kidnapping women, enslaving them, raping them, and trading them like property.

It was NOT a question that defendants would like to continue polygamy, because our nation from its inception, did NOT support polygamy, but instead opted for one man and woman in marriage. Thus, the defendants could not want something to continue that was NEVER STARTED! And so, in this way, this judge then justifies same sex marriage because of what was traditional in OTHER SOCIETIES!

"Crabb pointed out that tradition was used as an argument to keep women from voting."

I'll just say a little about this. After getting the right to vote, women tended to consistently vote Democrat, which has led to today's society of; killing the unborn, runaway illegal immigration, runaway welfare and food stamps, same sex marriage, destruction of a great educational system, and a President who relishes letting terrorists go who plan to kill the people who voted for that President, and in the near future, a society due for many many more horrors.